public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
Cc: "Paul `Rusty' Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] micro optimization in kernel/params.c; don't call to_module_kobject before we really have to.
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 19:13:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41FC2693.6060601@didntduck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0501300024110.2829@dragon.hygekrogen.localhost>

Jesper Juhl wrote:
> In kernel/params.c::module_attr_show and 
> kernel/params.c::module_attr_store we call to_module_kobject() and save 
> the result in a local variable right before a conditional statement that 
> does not depend on the call to to_module_kobject() and may cause the 
> function to return. If the function returns before we use the result of 
> to_module_kobject() then the call is just a waste of time. 
> The patch moves the call to to_module_kobject() down just before it is 
> actually used, thus we save a call to the function in a few cases. I doubt 
> this is in any way measurable, but I see no reason to not move the call - 
> it should be an infinitesimal improvement with no ill sideeffects.
> Please consider applying.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
> 
> diff -up linux-2.6.11-rc2-bk7-orig/kernel/params.c linux-2.6.11-rc2-bk7/kernel/params.c
> --- linux-2.6.11-rc2-bk7-orig/kernel/params.c	2005-01-29 23:54:53.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11-rc2-bk7/kernel/params.c	2005-01-30 00:27:08.000000000 +0100
> @@ -625,11 +625,12 @@ static ssize_t module_attr_show(struct k
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	attribute = to_module_attr(attr);
> -	mk = to_module_kobject(kobj);
>  
>  	if (!attribute->show)
>  		return -EPERM;
>  
> +	mk = to_module_kobject(kobj);
> +
>  	if (!try_module_get(mk->mod))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> @@ -649,11 +650,12 @@ static ssize_t module_attr_store(struct 
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	attribute = to_module_attr(attr);
> -	mk = to_module_kobject(kobj);
>  
>  	if (!attribute->store)
>  		return -EPERM;
>  
> +	mk = to_module_kobject(kobj);
> +
>  	if (!try_module_get(mk->mod))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> 
> 
> 

I'd bet that the compiler already reorders the assignment since there is 
no side effect to to_module_kobject().  Even with a patch like this you 
can't control exactly when the assignment is done.  There may not even 
be an assignment, since mk is a constant offset of kobj.

--
				Brian Gerst

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-30  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-29 23:45 [PATCH] micro optimization in kernel/params.c; don't call to_module_kobject before we really have to Jesper Juhl
2005-01-30  0:13 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2005-01-30 12:43   ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-31  3:43     ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41FC2693.6060601@didntduck.org \
    --to=bgerst@didntduck.org \
    --cc=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox