From: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
Cc: "Paul `Rusty' Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] micro optimization in kernel/params.c; don't call to_module_kobject before we really have to.
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 19:13:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41FC2693.6060601@didntduck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0501300024110.2829@dragon.hygekrogen.localhost>
Jesper Juhl wrote:
> In kernel/params.c::module_attr_show and
> kernel/params.c::module_attr_store we call to_module_kobject() and save
> the result in a local variable right before a conditional statement that
> does not depend on the call to to_module_kobject() and may cause the
> function to return. If the function returns before we use the result of
> to_module_kobject() then the call is just a waste of time.
> The patch moves the call to to_module_kobject() down just before it is
> actually used, thus we save a call to the function in a few cases. I doubt
> this is in any way measurable, but I see no reason to not move the call -
> it should be an infinitesimal improvement with no ill sideeffects.
> Please consider applying.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
>
> diff -up linux-2.6.11-rc2-bk7-orig/kernel/params.c linux-2.6.11-rc2-bk7/kernel/params.c
> --- linux-2.6.11-rc2-bk7-orig/kernel/params.c 2005-01-29 23:54:53.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.11-rc2-bk7/kernel/params.c 2005-01-30 00:27:08.000000000 +0100
> @@ -625,11 +625,12 @@ static ssize_t module_attr_show(struct k
> int ret;
>
> attribute = to_module_attr(attr);
> - mk = to_module_kobject(kobj);
>
> if (!attribute->show)
> return -EPERM;
>
> + mk = to_module_kobject(kobj);
> +
> if (!try_module_get(mk->mod))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -649,11 +650,12 @@ static ssize_t module_attr_store(struct
> int ret;
>
> attribute = to_module_attr(attr);
> - mk = to_module_kobject(kobj);
>
> if (!attribute->store)
> return -EPERM;
>
> + mk = to_module_kobject(kobj);
> +
> if (!try_module_get(mk->mod))
> return -ENODEV;
>
>
>
>
I'd bet that the compiler already reorders the assignment since there is
no side effect to to_module_kobject(). Even with a patch like this you
can't control exactly when the assignment is done. There may not even
be an assignment, since mk is a constant offset of kobj.
--
Brian Gerst
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-30 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-29 23:45 [PATCH] micro optimization in kernel/params.c; don't call to_module_kobject before we really have to Jesper Juhl
2005-01-30 0:13 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2005-01-30 12:43 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-01-31 3:43 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41FC2693.6060601@didntduck.org \
--to=bgerst@didntduck.org \
--cc=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox