From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261492AbVBAAaw (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:30:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261475AbVBAA2U (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:28:20 -0500 Received: from zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.57]:48777 "EHLO zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261496AbVBAAP2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:15:28 -0500 Message-ID: <41FECA18.50609@nortelnetworks.com> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:15:20 -0600 X-Sybari-Space: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 From: Chris Friesen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Linux kernel Subject: question on symbol exports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It appears that in 2.6.9 the ppc64 version of flush_tlb_page() depends on two symbols which are not currently exported: the function __flush_tlb_pending(), and the per-cpu variable ppc64_tlb_batch. Is there any particular reason why modules should not be allowed to flush the tlb, or is this an oversight? Chris