Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] KVM: x86: Use linear_read_system() to read the TSS I/O bitmap

[Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>]

On 8/6/2026 9:15 AM, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> TSS I/O permission bitmap reads are implicit supervisor accesses which
> are subject to Linear Address Space Separation (LASS) enforcement.

I am not sure about it.

According to SDM vol 3a (253668-089US), Chapter "LINEAR-ADDRESS PRE-PROCESSING",
section "MODE-BASED ACCESSES AND LINEAR-ADDRESS-SPACE PARTITIONING", it defines
and limits "implicit supervisor-mode accesses" to the following operations:
- accesses to the global descriptor table (GDT) or local descriptor table (LDT)
  to load a segment descriptor
- accesses to the interrupt descriptor table (IDT) when delivering an interrupt
  or exception
- accesses to the task-state segment (TSS) as part of a task switch or change of
  CPL
- accesses to a user posted-interrupt descriptor (UPID) during user-interrupt
  notification processing

IIUC, the TSS I/O bitmap read during ordinary instruction execution
(under CPL = 3) rather than during a task switch or CPL transition, I don't
think they fall under the classification of implicit supervisor-mode accesses.

> Though highly unlikely, if a guest configures a TSS base in the
> user half, hardware would raise a #GP on access when LASS is enabled.
> 
> Currently, the emulator reads the I/O permission bitmap from the TSS by
> calling read_std() directly which is inconsistent with other implicit
> accesses in the emulator such as IDT reads, GDT/LDT reads and TSS reads
> during task switch.
> 
> An upcoming change will add a check to linear_read_system() to catch
> LASS violations. For consistency as well as to keep LASS enforcement
> centralized, switch both I/O bitmap reads to linear_read_system().
> 
> Note, emulator_io_port_access_allowed() doesn't propagate faults, so
> even though linear_read_system() will set the exception details they
> will be ignored.
> 
> While at it, fix an off-by-one in the I/O bitmap bounds check to account
> for the 2-byte read and ensure both bytes are within the TSS limit. The
> SDM mandates a trailing 0xFF byte after the bitmap so any out-of-bounds
> access would be all 1s (denying access). Make the change primarily to
> ensure hardware fidelity. A correctly configured OS will not run into
> this issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - New patch
> 
> There could be a pre-existing issue here. It is unlikely that any OS
> demand-pages the I/O bitmap portion of the TSS. But if it does, the #PF
> details could get lost and the guest would get a #GP instead of a
> restartable #PF. Propagating the #PF to the callers is a larger change
> that is beyond the scope of this series.
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index 8ff28643b2e3..7f04544cfee5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -2573,12 +2573,12 @@ static bool emulator_io_port_access_allowed(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>  	base |= ((u64)base3) << 32;
>  #endif
> -	r = ops->read_std(ctxt, base + 102, &io_bitmap_ptr, 2, NULL, true);
> +	r = linear_read_system(ctxt, base + 102, &io_bitmap_ptr, 2);
>  	if (r != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
>  		return false;
> -	if (io_bitmap_ptr + port/8 > desc_limit_scaled(&tr_seg))
> +	if (io_bitmap_ptr + port/8 + 1 > desc_limit_scaled(&tr_seg))
>  		return false;
> -	r = ops->read_std(ctxt, base + io_bitmap_ptr + port/8, &perm, 2, NULL, true);
> +	r = linear_read_system(ctxt, base + io_bitmap_ptr + port/8, &perm, 2);
>  	if (r != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
>  		return false;
>  	if ((perm >> bit_idx) & mask)