From: matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
dinguyen@kernel.org, joyce.ooi@intel.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matthew.gerlach@altera.com,
peter.colberg@altera.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] arm64: dts: agilex: add dtsi for PCIe Root Port
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 10:07:19 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41edda71-de9d-e4e0-ef62-83e98f753e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z5qS1NKSRn8pSqg1@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025, Frank Li wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 11:35:48AM -0600, Matthew Gerlach wrote:
>> Add the base device tree for support of the PCIe Root Port
>> for the Agilex family of chips.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> v3:
>> - Remove accepted patches from patch set.
>>
>> v2:
>> - Rename node to fix schema check error.
>> ---
>> .../intel/socfpga_agilex_pcie_root_port.dtsi | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_pcie_root_port.dtsi
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_pcie_root_port.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_pcie_root_port.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..50f131f5791b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_pcie_root_port.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2024, Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +&soc0 {
>> + aglx_hps_bridges: fpga-bus@80000000 {
>> + compatible = "simple-bus";
>> + reg = <0x80000000 0x20200000>,
>> + <0xf9000000 0x00100000>;
>> + reg-names = "axi_h2f", "axi_h2f_lw";
>> + #address-cells = <0x2>;
>> + #size-cells = <0x1>;
>> + ranges = <0x00000000 0x00000000 0x80000000 0x00040000>,
>> + <0x00000000 0x10000000 0x90100000 0x0ff00000>,
>> + <0x00000000 0x20000000 0xa0000000 0x00200000>,
>> + <0x00000001 0x00010000 0xf9010000 0x00008000>,
>> + <0x00000001 0x00018000 0xf9018000 0x00000080>,
>> + <0x00000001 0x00018080 0xf9018080 0x00000010>;
>> +
>> + pcie_0_pcie_aglx: pcie@200000000 {
>> + reg = <0x00000000 0x10000000 0x10000000>,
>> + <0x00000001 0x00010000 0x00008000>,
>> + <0x00000000 0x20000000 0x00200000>;
>> + reg-names = "Txs", "Cra", "Hip";
>> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0x14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <0x1>;
>> + device_type = "pci";
>> + bus-range = <0x0000000 0x000000ff>;
>> + ranges = <0x82000000 0x00000000 0x00100000 0x00000000 0x10000000 0x00000000 0x0ff00000>;
>
> This convert to pci address 0x0010_0000..0x1000_0000 from parent bus address
> 0x1000_0000..0x1ff0_0000
>
> aglx_hps_bridges bridge convert 0x90100000..0xa000_0000 (cpu address) to
> 0x1000_0000..0x1ff0_0000 according to ranges[1](second entry).
>
> Just want to confirm that "0x1000_0000..0x1ff0_0000" is actually reflect
> hardware behavior.
As far as I know, these conversions reflect the actual hardware behavior,
but I will investigate further to confirm.
>
> On going a thread
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/Z5pfiJyXB3NtGSfe@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810/T/#t
>
> Try to clean up all cpu_addr_fixup() or similar fixup() in pci root complex
> drivers, but which require dtsi reflect the real hardware behavior.
>
> In most current pci driver, even "0x1000_0000..0x1ff0_0000" is wrong, it
> still work by drivers' fixup. If dts correct descript hardware, these
> fixup can be removed.
The current driver, drivers/pci/controller/pcie-altera.c, does not have
any cpu_addr_fix(); so I think the dts is properly describing the
hardware, but I will continue to investigate and follow the thread
to clean the fixups.
>
> best regards
> Frank
Thanks for the feedback,
Matthew Gerlach
>
>> + msi-parent = <&pcie_0_msi_irq>;
>> + #address-cells = <0x3>;
>> + #size-cells = <0x2>;
>> + interrupt-map-mask = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x7>;
>> + interrupt-map = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x1 &pcie_0_pcie_aglx 0 0 0 0x1>,
>> + <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x2 &pcie_0_pcie_aglx 0 0 0 0x2>,
>> + <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x3 &pcie_0_pcie_aglx 0 0 0 0x3>,
>> + <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x4 &pcie_0_pcie_aglx 0 0 0 0x4>;
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>> +
>> + pcie_0_msi_irq: msi@10008080 {
>> + compatible = "altr,msi-1.0";
>> + reg = <0x00000001 0x00018080 0x00000010>,
>> + <0x00000001 0x00018000 0x00000080>;
>> + reg-names = "csr", "vector_slave";
>> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0x13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + msi-controller;
>> + num-vectors = <0x20>;
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-01 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-27 17:35 [PATCH v5 0/5] Add PCIe Root Port support for Agilex family of chips Matthew Gerlach
2025-01-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: PCI: altera: Add binding for Agilex Matthew Gerlach
2025-01-30 7:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-01 18:11 ` matthew.gerlach
2025-01-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] arm64: dts: agilex: add soc0 label Matthew Gerlach
2025-01-29 9:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-29 19:10 ` matthew.gerlach
2025-01-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] arm64: dts: agilex: add dtsi for PCIe Root Port Matthew Gerlach
2025-01-29 9:47 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-29 19:42 ` matthew.gerlach
2025-01-30 7:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-01 19:12 ` matthew.gerlach
2025-02-02 14:17 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-02 18:49 ` matthew.gerlach
2025-02-02 19:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-04 17:15 ` matthew.gerlach
2025-01-29 20:43 ` Frank Li
2025-02-01 18:07 ` matthew.gerlach [this message]
2025-01-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: dts: agilex: add dts enabling " Matthew Gerlach
2025-01-29 9:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-29 22:54 ` matthew.gerlach
2025-01-30 7:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-04 16:57 ` matthew.gerlach
2025-02-05 7:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] PCI: altera: Add Agilex support Matthew Gerlach
2025-01-29 9:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-29 23:03 ` matthew.gerlach
2025-02-03 14:18 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-03 14:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41edda71-de9d-e4e0-ef62-83e98f753e@linux.intel.com \
--to=matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=joyce.ooi@intel.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=matthew.gerlach@altera.com \
--cc=peter.colberg@altera.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox