From: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>,
ncunningham@linuxmail.org,
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2005@gmx.net>,
ACPI List <acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 12:35:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4204AF64.9060201@rainbow-software.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050205093550.GC1158@elf.ucw.cz>
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>>>We already try to do that, but it hangs on 70% of machines. See
>>>Documentation/power/video.txt.
>>
>>We know that all of these ROMs are run at power on so they have to
>>work. This implies that there must be something wrong with the
>>environment the ROM are being run in. Video ROMs make calls into the
>>INT vectors of the system BIOS. If these haven't been set up yet
>>running the VBIOS is sure to hang. Has someone with ROM source and
>>the appropriate debugging tools tried to debug one of these hangs?
>>Alternatively code could be added to wakeup.S to try and set these up
>>or dump the ones that are there and see if they are sane.
>
>
> Rumors say that notebooks no longer have video bios at C000h:0; rumors
> say that video BIOS on notebooks is simply integrated into main system
> BIOS. I personaly do not know if rumors are true, but PCs are ugly
> machines....
On systems with integrated graphics chips, there is no separate ROM chip
for Video BIOS. Instead, it's integrated into system BIOS (this is true
for onboard SCSI and pseudo-RAID controllerss too). During early
initialization, system BIOS decompresses and initializes these BIOSes
(if these is a PCI vendor ID and device ID match). (There is nothing
wrong with this - BIOSes on PCI cards should not be run directly from
the card's ROM but copied to RAM and executed from there instead
according to PCI spec.)
After the POST is complete, the BIOSes are shadowed in RAM so Video BIOS
is at C000:0 - so you can run DOS for example.
--
Ondrej Zary
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-05 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050122134205.GA9354@wsc-gmbh.de>
[not found] ` <4201825B.2090703@gmx.net>
[not found] ` <e796392205020221387d4d8562@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <420217DB.709@gmx.net>
[not found] ` <4202A972.1070003@gmx.net>
[not found] ` <20050203225410.GB1110@elf.ucw.cz>
[not found] ` <1107474198.5727.9.camel@desktop.cunninghams>
2005-02-04 2:35 ` [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume (was: Re: [ACPI] Samsung P35, S3, black screen (radeon)) Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-02-04 2:51 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-04 7:18 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-04 7:44 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-04 17:38 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-05 0:52 ` [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-02-05 1:08 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-05 9:35 ` [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume (was: Re: [ACPI] Samsung P35, S3, black screen (radeon)) Pavel Machek
2005-02-05 11:35 ` Ondrej Zary [this message]
2005-02-06 16:02 ` Alan Cox
2005-02-07 2:11 ` Adam Sulmicki
2005-02-07 14:27 ` [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume Paulo Marques
2005-02-07 14:36 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-02-07 15:39 ` Paulo Marques
2005-02-07 16:01 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-07 16:20 ` Li-Ta Lo
2005-02-11 1:47 ` [ACPI] " Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-02-07 18:04 ` Adam Sulmicki
2005-02-07 16:39 ` Li-Ta Lo
2005-02-07 13:24 ` [ACPI] Re: [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume (was: Re: [ACPI] Samsung P35, S3, black screen (radeon)) Matthew Garrett
2005-02-07 14:09 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-10 19:13 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-02-10 19:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
2005-02-10 20:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-02-10 20:17 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-10 20:29 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-02-10 20:34 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-10 20:46 ` [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume Kendall Bennett
2005-02-10 21:06 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-02-10 21:20 ` Kendall Bennett
2005-02-10 21:28 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-10 22:53 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-02-11 1:41 ` [ACPI] " Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-02-10 20:32 ` [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume (was: Re: [ACPI] Samsung P35, S3, black screen (radeon)) Ville Syrjälä
2005-02-10 19:31 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-10 23:03 ` Matan Ziv-Av
2005-02-07 19:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-02-07 20:59 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-04 5:03 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-04 7:49 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-04 12:17 ` [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-02-04 13:51 ` [ACPI] " Matthew Garrett
2005-02-04 16:30 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-04 17:31 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-04 18:10 ` Jesse Barnes
2005-02-04 20:29 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-04 22:13 ` James Simmons
2005-02-04 21:56 ` James Simmons
2005-02-04 22:59 ` Legacy IO spaces (was Re: [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume) Jon Smirl
2005-02-04 23:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2005-02-05 0:48 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-05 22:42 ` [ACPI] " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-02-06 0:17 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-06 0:07 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-06 0:19 ` Jesse Barnes
2005-02-05 2:04 ` [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume Matthew Garrett
2005-02-05 2:09 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-05 2:17 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-02-05 2:30 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-05 8:15 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-02-05 11:53 ` Ondrej Zary
2005-02-05 12:28 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-02-05 15:47 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-05 16:48 ` [ACPI] " Stefan Dösinger
2005-02-05 17:38 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-06 11:05 ` Stefan Dösinger
2005-02-07 10:20 ` Helge Hafting
2005-02-07 14:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-05 15:55 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-05 9:37 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-05 9:49 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-05 15:49 ` Jon Smirl
2005-02-04 22:09 ` James Simmons
2005-02-05 1:07 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-02-05 1:14 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-02-04 14:40 ` [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume (was: Re: [ACPI] Samsung P35, S3, black screen (radeon)) Xavier Bestel
2005-02-05 1:10 ` [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-02-04 7:48 ` [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume (was: Re: [ACPI] Samsung P35, S3, black screen (radeon)) Pavel Machek
2005-02-04 10:26 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-02-04 11:32 ` [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-02-04 12:11 ` [ACPI] " David Goodenough
2005-02-04 16:15 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] <fa.fmtnc0t.131o1g5@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.eiu608d.10522qb@ifi.uio.no>
2005-02-12 13:10 ` Bodo Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4204AF64.9060201@rainbow-software.org \
--to=linux@rainbow-software.org \
--cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=c-d.hailfinger.devel.2005@gmx.net \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).