From: Clemens Schwaighofer <cs@tequila.co.jp>
To: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>,
Pozsar Balazs <pozsy@uhulinux.hu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: msdos/vfat defaults are annoying
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:00:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4207746A.2070401@tequila.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050207112914.GB2686@pclin040.win.tue.nl>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07.02.2005 20:29, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> Making a symlink /etc/filesystems -> /proc/filesystems is
> meaningless.
well to be honest, I didn't even know Gentoo makes a symlink here, but
I'll definitly will make bug entry for that.
Perhaps its a default setting. eg Debian doesn't have a /etc/filesystems
file by defauly anyway.
> It is not true that vfat is universally better than msdos.
> Some need one, some need the other.
but to be honest, most times I need vfat, and I actually haven't
encountered a time when I need msdos.
lg, clemens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD4DBQFCB3RpjBz/yQjBxz8RAlQBAJjj0IIhxCPWvWinMpi6J5UOJ9bBAJ9oQnI4
A6sIi+MzKiFbvpLIiQI1YQ==
=rmlN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-07 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-06 5:33 msdos/vfat defaults are annoying John Richard Moser
2005-02-06 7:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-02-06 16:29 ` John Richard Moser
2005-02-06 23:21 ` [PATCH] " Pozsar Balazs
2005-02-07 0:36 ` Al Viro
2005-02-07 0:42 ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-02-07 2:48 ` Nuno Monteiro
2005-02-07 8:47 ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-02-07 12:53 ` Michelle Konzack
2005-02-07 21:59 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-02-07 14:27 ` Nuno Monteiro
2005-02-08 23:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-02-07 6:53 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2005-02-07 11:29 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-02-07 12:45 ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-02-07 14:00 ` Clemens Schwaighofer [this message]
2005-02-08 0:23 ` Horst von Brand
2005-02-08 2:24 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2005-02-06 11:15 ` Michelle Konzack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4207746A.2070401@tequila.co.jp \
--to=cs@tequila.co.jp \
--cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nigelenki@comcast.net \
--cc=pozsy@uhulinux.hu \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).