From: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.11-rc3: Kylix application no longer works?
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:03:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <420801D7.3020405@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050207145100.6208b8b9.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> I wonder if reverting the patch will restore the old behaviour?
>
> # This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
> #
> # ChangeSet
> # 2005/01/21 13:42:18-08:00 davem@nuts.davemloft.net
> # Merge nuts.davemloft.net:/disk1/BK/sparcwork-2.6
> # into nuts.davemloft.net:/disk1/BK/sparc-2.6
> #
> # fs/binfmt_elf.c
> # 2005/01/21 13:42:06-08:00 davem@nuts.davemloft.net +0 -0
> # Auto merged
> #
> # ChangeSet
> # 2005/01/17 13:38:38-08:00 ecd@skynet.be
> # [SPARC64]: Missing user access return value checks in fs/binfmt_elf.c and fs/compat.c
> #
> # Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> #
> # fs/compat_ioctl.c
> # 2005/01/17 13:37:56-08:00 ecd@skynet.be +12 -5
> # [SPARC64]: Missing user access return value checks in fs/binfmt_elf.c and fs/compat.c
> #
> # fs/binfmt_elf.c
> # 2005/01/17 13:37:56-08:00 ecd@skynet.be +43 -19
> # [SPARC64]: Missing user access return value checks in fs/binfmt_elf.c and fs/compat.c
> #
I think so. For a short period we applied this patch to the Gentoo 2.6.10
kernel...
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/gentoo-dev-sources/release-10.01/dist/1900_umem_catch.patch
...but removed it once users complained it stopped kylix binaries from running.
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-07 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-07 22:11 2.6.11-rc3: Kylix application no longer works? Pavel Machek
2005-02-07 22:51 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-08 0:03 ` Daniel Drake [this message]
2005-02-08 0:18 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-08 0:56 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2005-02-08 4:06 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-08 17:13 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-08 8:15 ` Daniel Drake
2005-02-08 17:27 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-08 17:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-08 19:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-02-09 2:10 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-09 11:11 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-09 15:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-02-09 20:13 ` Rik van Riel
2005-02-12 0:39 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-02-08 20:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-02-08 22:27 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=420801D7.3020405@gentoo.org \
--to=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox