Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01

[George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>]

I am seeing:
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x4974): In function `copy_mm':
/usr/src/cvs/mvl-kernel-26/makena/linux-2.6.10/kernel/fork.c:493: undefined 
reference to `__spin_is_locked'
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x9f5a): In function `next_thread':
/usr/src/cvs/mvl-kernel-26/makena/linux-2.6.10/kernel/exit.c:877: undefined 
reference to `__raw_rwlock_is_locked'
net/built-in.o(.text+0x1258): In function `__sock_create':
/usr/src/cvs/mvl-kernel-26/makena/linux-2.6.10/net/socket.c:175: undefined 
reference to `__spin_is_locked'
net/built-in.o(.text+0x16b54): In function `dev_deactivate':
/usr/src/cvs/mvl-kernel-26/makena/linux-2.6.10/net/sched/sch_generic.c:594: 
undefined reference to `__spin_is_locked'
make[1]: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
make: *** [bzImage] Error 2


Possibly from:
define __raw_spin_is_locked(x)	(*(volatile signed char *)(&(x)->lock) <= 0)
#define __raw_spin_unlock_wait(x) \
	do { barrier(); } while(__spin_is_locked(x))
in asm/spinlock.h

should that be __raw_spin_is_locked(x) instead?
-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/