Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm2

[Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>]

Paul Davis wrote:
>   [ the best solution is .... ]
> 
>   [ my preferred solution is ... ]
> 
>   [ it would be better if ... ]
> 
>   [ this is a kludge and it should be done instead like ... ]
> 
> did nobody read what andrew wrote and what JOQ pointed out?
> 
> after weeks of debating this, no other conceptual solution emerged
> that did not have at least as many problems as the RT LSM module, and
> all other proposed solutions were also more invasive of other aspects
> of kernel design and operations than RT LSM is.

As I see it, what I said was in support of RT LSM (or at least the 
approach that RT LSM is taking) so why are you attacking me.  I'm on 
your side :-)

Peter
PS I'm withdrawing the "unprivileged real time" feature from the 
spa_no_frills and zaphod schedulers in the PlugSched patch as a result 
of the discussions on SCHED_ISO and RT rlimits because the discussion 
convinced me that it's the wrong way to go.
-- 
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
  -- Ambrose Bierce