From: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
mgross@linux.intel.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com
Subject: Re: queue_work from interrupt Real time preemption2.6.11-rc2-RT-V0.7.37-03
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:59:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <421389F5.3060007@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050216081143.50d0a9d6.davem@davemloft.net>
David S. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 06:16:45 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Maybe the networking
>>stack would break if we allowed the TIMER softirq (thread) to preempt
>>the NET softirq (threads) (and vice versa)?
>
>
> The major assumption is that softirq's run indivisibly per-cpu.
> Otherwise the per-cpu queues of RX and TX packet work would
> get corrupted.
For what its worth, I, a short while ago, put together a workqueue package to a)
allow easy priority setting for work queues and b) change either softirq,
tasklet or bh code to use workqueues. This was done mostly with CPP macros and
a few conversion routines. I then converted the network code to use this
package simply by adding a key include to a couple of files. The result worked
on UP but ended up hanging the network code on SMP. Everything else still
worked, but not the net stuff. I never ran down the problem as the "boss" was
not interested in SMP...
George
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-16 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-14 20:40 queue_work from interrupt Real time preemption2.6.11-rc2-RT-V0.7.37-03 Mark Gross
2005-02-14 21:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-02-14 22:29 ` Mark Gross
2005-02-15 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-15 18:06 ` Mark Gross
2005-02-16 5:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-16 16:11 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-16 17:59 ` George Anzinger [this message]
2005-02-16 22:55 ` Mark Gross
2005-02-16 18:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-02-17 7:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-17 15:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-02-17 7:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-17 14:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-02-17 16:14 ` Mark Gross
2005-03-29 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 18:41 ` Mark Gross
2005-04-01 5:55 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=421389F5.3060007@mvista.com \
--to=george@mvista.com \
--cc=Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox