Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

Clemens Schwaighofer
2005-02-17T00:11:56Z

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/17/2005 12:43 AM, Olivier Galibert wrote:

>>Perhaps its about time, that linux also switches.
>
>
> Think what you want of Larry, but SVN is nowhere near BK is term of
> capabilities (and neither is arch for he matter). It's only better
> compared to cvs, and then not by that much.

first. what kind of advantages does bk have over other svn? Seriously.
If Apache can use it, and gcc might use it (again two very large
projects), what makes linux so differetnt that it can't.

And I don't want _anything_ from Larry. I am just pointing out, that
this kind of legal clause is more ridicolous than understandable.

Last, why can you compare cvs to bk? and not subversion, or arch? arch
and subversion are way superiour to cvs ...

> SCM is hard and not sexy, I'm afraid.

yes its hard, so we have to use bk with a very strange license?
better close the eyes and not change. What do you think is kernel
coding? Walk in the park? Do you think all those developers say, nah I
better use Windows or Mac OS X, because its hard and not sexy ... pah
... BS!

- --
[ Clemens Schwaighofer -----=====:::::~ ]
[ TBWA\ && TEQUILA\ Japan IT Group ]
[ 6-17-2 Ginza Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0061, JAPAN ]
[ Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703 Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343 ]
[ http://www.tequila.co.jp http://www.tbwajapan.co.jp ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCE+FAjBz/yQjBxz8RAjgHAKDf03ccZzlYDaFcZtNyG5Do3pba0QCfQk31
R7mSvvgMI7IQ9C4/ahc0Hak=
=L8t2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----