From: Patrick Gefre <pfg@sgi.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Altix : ioc4 serial driver support
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:55:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <421512C8.9010304@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <420BCD23.9080808@sgi.com>
Andrew,
Since there don't seem to be any more suggestions, can you take this - or at least queue it up ???
This is a resend:
I updated again with more __iomem tags.
ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/sn2/sn2-update/033-ioc4-support
Signed-off-by: Patrick Gefre <pfg@sgi.com>
>
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:09:43AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, February 8, 2005 8:52 am, Patrick Gefre wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've update the patch with changes from the comments below.
>>>>
>>>> ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/sn2/sn2-update/033-ioc4-support
>>>>
>>>> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:58:33AM -0600, Patrick Gefre wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Latest version with review mods:
>>>>>> ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/sn2/sn2-update/033-ioc4-support
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - still not __iomem annotations.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I *think* I have this right ??
>>>
>>>
>>> Here's the output from 'make C=1' with your driver patched in (you if
>>> you want
>>> to run it yourself, just copy tomahawk.engr:~jbarnes/bin/sparse to
>>> somewhere
>>> in your path and run 'make C=1'). I think most of these warning
>>> would be
>>> fixed up if the structure fields referring to registers were declared as
>>> __iomem, but I haven't looked carefully.
>>
>>
>>
>> Actually the pointers to the struct need to be declared __iomem.
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-17 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-22 0:28 [PATCH] 2.6.10 Altix : ioc4 serial driver support Pat Gefre
2004-12-22 13:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-12-22 14:03 ` Russell King
2004-12-22 15:20 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-12-22 18:49 ` Russell King
2004-12-22 19:53 ` Patrick Gefre
2004-12-22 20:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-01-03 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-31 22:45 ` [PATCH] " Pat Gefre
2005-02-01 9:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-02-02 20:36 ` Patrick Gefre
2005-02-02 21:37 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-02-02 21:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-02-07 15:58 ` Patrick Gefre
2005-02-07 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-02-08 16:52 ` Patrick Gefre
2005-02-08 19:32 ` Patrick Gefre
2005-02-10 19:09 ` Jesse Barnes
2005-02-10 19:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-02-10 21:07 ` Patrick Gefre
2005-02-17 21:55 ` Patrick Gefre [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=421512C8.9010304@sgi.com \
--to=pfg@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox