From: Kaigai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com>,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net, tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de,
erikj@subway.americas.sgi.com, limin@dbear.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:54:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <421993A2.4020308@ak.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050218171610.757ba9c9.akpm@osdl.org>
Hello, everyone.
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com> wrote:
>
>>Since the need of Linux system accounting has gone beyond what BSD
>>accounting provides, i think it is a good idea to create a thin layer
>>of common code for various accounting packages, such as BSD accounting,
>>CSA, ELSA, etc. The hook to do_exit() at exit.c was changed to invoke
>>a routine in the common code which would then invoke those accounting
>>packages that register to the acct_common to handle do_exit situation.
>
>
> This all seems to be heading in the wrong direction. Do we really want to
> have lots of different system accounting packages all hooking into a
> generic we-cant-decide-what-to-do-so-we-added-some-pointless-overhead
> framework?
>
> Can't we get _one_ accounting system in there, get it right, avoid the
> framework?
I think there are two issues about system accounting framework.
Issue: 1) How to define the appropriate unit for accounting ?
Current BSD-accountiong make a collection per process accounting information.
CSA make additionally a collection per process-aggregation accounting.
It is appropriate to make the fork-exit event handling framework for definition
of the process-aggregation, such as PAGG.
This system-accounting per process-aggregation is quite useful,
thought I tried the SGI's implementation named 'job' in past days.
Issue: 2) What items should be collected for accounting information ?
BSD-accounting collects PID/UID/GID, User/Sys/Elapsed-Time, and # of
minor/major page faults. SGI's CSA collects VM/RSS size on exit time,
Integral-VM/RSS, and amount of block-I/O additionally.
I think it's hard to implement the accounting-engine as a kernel loadable
module using any kinds of framework. Because, we must put callback functions
into all around the kernel for this purpose.
Thus, I make a proposion as follows:
We should separate the process-aggregation functionality and collecting
accounting informations.
Something of framework to implement process-aggregation is necessary.
And, making a collection of accounting information should be merged
into BSD-accounting and implemented as a part of monolithic kernel
as Guillaume said.
Thanks.
--
Linux Promotion Center, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-21 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-19 0:51 A common layer for Accounting packages Jay Lan
2005-02-19 1:16 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-21 6:51 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-22 20:11 ` [Lse-tech] " Jay Lan
2005-02-23 7:30 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-21 7:54 ` Kaigai Kohei [this message]
2005-02-22 20:26 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-23 7:07 ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-02-23 7:20 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-23 8:33 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-23 8:51 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-23 9:30 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-23 9:36 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-23 19:11 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-24 7:42 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-23 9:50 ` Tim Schmielau
2005-02-24 22:27 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-23 11:29 ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-02-23 20:48 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-25 5:07 ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-02-25 5:28 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-25 17:32 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-25 17:45 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-25 18:11 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-25 21:30 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-25 22:18 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-27 9:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-27 15:20 ` KaiGai Kohei
2005-02-27 14:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-27 19:27 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-28 1:59 ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-02-28 2:32 ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-28 5:17 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-02-28 7:20 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-28 7:39 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-28 8:04 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-02-28 12:10 ` jamal
2005-02-28 9:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-28 13:20 ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-28 13:40 ` jamal
2005-02-28 13:53 ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-28 9:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-28 14:10 ` jamal
2005-02-28 14:25 ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-28 15:31 ` jamal
2005-02-28 16:17 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-03-01 8:21 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-01 13:38 ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-03-01 13:53 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-01 14:17 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-03-02 4:50 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-02 8:58 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-02 9:06 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-02 9:25 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-02 15:30 ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-01 20:40 ` Paul Jackson
2005-02-24 1:25 ` Paul Jackson
2005-02-24 1:56 ` Jay Lan
2005-02-24 2:07 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=421993A2.4020308@ak.jp.nec.com \
--to=kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=erikj@subway.americas.sgi.com \
--cc=guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net \
--cc=jlan@sgi.com \
--cc=limin@dbear.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox