public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kaigai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com>,
	lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net, tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de,
	erikj@subway.americas.sgi.com, limin@dbear.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:54:10 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <421993A2.4020308@ak.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050218171610.757ba9c9.akpm@osdl.org>

Hello, everyone.

Andrew Morton wrote:
 > Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com> wrote:
 >
 >>Since the need of Linux system accounting has gone beyond what BSD
 >>accounting provides, i think it is a good idea to create a thin layer
 >>of common code for various accounting packages, such as BSD accounting,
 >>CSA, ELSA, etc. The hook to do_exit() at exit.c was changed to invoke
 >>a routine in the common code which would then invoke those accounting
 >>packages that register to the acct_common to handle do_exit situation.
 >
 >
 > This all seems to be heading in the wrong direction.  Do we really want to
 > have lots of different system accounting packages all hooking into a
 > generic we-cant-decide-what-to-do-so-we-added-some-pointless-overhead
 > framework?
 >
 > Can't we get _one_ accounting system in there, get it right, avoid the
 > framework?

I think there are two issues about system accounting framework.

Issue: 1) How to define the appropriate unit for accounting ?
Current BSD-accountiong make a collection per process accounting information.
CSA make additionally a collection per process-aggregation accounting.

It is appropriate to make the fork-exit event handling framework for definition
of the process-aggregation, such as PAGG.

This system-accounting per process-aggregation is quite useful,
thought I tried the SGI's implementation named 'job' in past days.


Issue: 2) What items should be collected for accounting information ?
BSD-accounting collects PID/UID/GID, User/Sys/Elapsed-Time, and # of
minor/major page faults. SGI's CSA collects VM/RSS size on exit time,
Integral-VM/RSS, and amount of block-I/O additionally.

I think it's hard to implement the accounting-engine as a kernel loadable
module using any kinds of framework. Because, we must put callback functions
into all around the kernel for this purpose.

Thus, I make a proposion as follows:
We should separate the process-aggregation functionality and collecting
accounting informations.
Something of framework to implement process-aggregation is necessary.
And, making a collection of accounting information should be merged
into BSD-accounting and implemented as a part of monolithic kernel
as Guillaume said.

Thanks.
-- 
Linux Promotion Center, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-02-21  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-19  0:51 A common layer for Accounting packages Jay Lan
2005-02-19  1:16 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-21  6:51   ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-22 20:11     ` [Lse-tech] " Jay Lan
2005-02-23  7:30       ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-21  7:54   ` Kaigai Kohei [this message]
2005-02-22 20:26     ` Jay Lan
2005-02-23  7:07       ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-02-23  7:20         ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-23  8:33           ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-23  8:51             ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-23  9:30               ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-23  9:36                 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-23 19:11             ` Jay Lan
2005-02-24  7:42               ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-23  9:50           ` Tim Schmielau
2005-02-24 22:27             ` Jay Lan
2005-02-23 11:29           ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-02-23 20:48         ` Jay Lan
2005-02-25  5:07           ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-02-25  5:28             ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-25 17:32               ` Jay Lan
2005-02-25 17:45                 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-25 18:11                   ` Jay Lan
2005-02-25 21:30                 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-25 22:18                   ` Jay Lan
2005-02-27  9:49               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-27 15:20                 ` KaiGai Kohei
2005-02-27 14:03                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-27 19:27                     ` David S. Miller
2005-02-28  1:59                     ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-02-28  2:32                       ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-28  5:17                       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-02-28  7:20                       ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-28  7:39                         ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-28  8:04                           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-02-28 12:10                           ` jamal
2005-02-28  9:29                             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-28 13:20                             ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-28 13:40                               ` jamal
2005-02-28 13:53                                 ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-28  9:52                                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-28 14:10                                   ` jamal
2005-02-28 14:25                                     ` Thomas Graf
2005-02-28 15:31                                       ` jamal
2005-02-28 16:17                                         ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-03-01  8:21                                           ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-01 13:38                                             ` Kaigai Kohei
2005-03-01 13:53                                               ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-01 14:17                                                 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-03-02  4:50                                               ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-02  8:58                                               ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-02  9:06                                                 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-02  9:25                                                   ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-03-02 15:30                                                   ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-01 20:40                             ` Paul Jackson
2005-02-24  1:25         ` Paul Jackson
2005-02-24  1:56           ` Jay Lan
2005-02-24  2:07             ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=421993A2.4020308@ak.jp.nec.com \
    --to=kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=erikj@subway.americas.sgi.com \
    --cc=guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net \
    --cc=jlan@sgi.com \
    --cc=limin@dbear.engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox