From: Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com>
To: gene.heskett@verizon.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OT: Why is usb data many times the cpu hog that firewire is?
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:40:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <421A2B18.2000102@grupopie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200502211325.55013.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 21 February 2005 12:58, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>[...]
>>A video stream over usb1.1 must be compressed due to bandwidth
>>available. Decompression needs cpu.
>>
>
> Thats what I was afraid of, which makes using it for a motion detected
> burgular alarm source considerably less than practical since the
> machine must be able to do other things too. Darn. And its usb1.1
> even when plugged into a 2.0 capable port.
Depending on the camera model you can try some bandwidth reduction
measures to try to make it send uncompressed video:
- reduce frame rate. Something as low as 2 fps should be enough for
motion detection.
- reduce requested resolution. This of course depends on whether you
have enough resolution or not.
- selecting gray scale images. I don't know if your motion detection
software is greatly affected by this, or not.
USB1.1 bandwidth is enought for 640x480, 8 bits gray scale (or color, 8
bits bayer pattern), at 3 fps.
Of course, you can always buy a USB2.0 camera :)
--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
Edmund Burke (1729 - 1797)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-21 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-21 17:16 OT: Why is usb data many times the cpu hog that firewire is? Gene Heskett
2005-02-21 17:58 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-02-21 18:25 ` Gene Heskett
2005-02-21 18:29 ` Wichert Akkerman
2005-02-21 22:08 ` Gene Heskett
2005-02-22 23:10 ` Matt Mackall
2005-02-23 13:13 ` Paulo Marques
2005-02-23 17:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-02-21 18:40 ` Paulo Marques [this message]
2005-02-21 18:46 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-02-24 11:52 ` David Ford
2005-02-22 8:53 ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-02-22 13:12 ` Gene Heskett
2005-02-23 23:28 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-02-24 23:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=421A2B18.2000102@grupopie.com \
--to=pmarques@grupopie.com \
--cc=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox