Re: [-mm patch] seccomp: don't say it was more or less mandatory

Andrea Arcangeli
2005-03-01T00:48:02Z

On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 01:32:47AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> If you want to use Cpushare, you know that you have to enable seccomp.

Oh yeah, I know it, you know it, but not everyone will know it while
configuring the kernel, infact I doubt they'll even know what Cpushare
is about while they configure the kernel ;). And I doubt they should be
required to know all those details in order to make that choice, and my
point is that seccomp is low overhead enough that everyone can enable it
if they're unsure, just in case. I'm just trying to explain why I
recommend it to Y by default "if unsure".