Re: via 6420 pata/sata controller

Jeff Garzik
2005-03-02T06:34:34Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 303 bytes --]

If I had to guess, I would try the attached patch. The via82cxxx.c
driver is a bit annoying in that, here we do not talk to the ISA bridge
but to the PCI device 0x4149 itself.

If this doesn't work, I could probably whip together a quick PATA driver
for libata that works on this hardware.

Jeff

[-- Attachment #2: patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1080 bytes --]

===== drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.c 1.27 vs edited =====
--- 1.27/drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.c 2005-02-03 02:24:29 -05:00
+++ edited/drivers/ide/pci/via82cxxx.c 2005-03-02 01:28:26 -05:00
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@
u8 rev_max;
u16 flags;
} via_isa_bridges[] = {
+ { "vt6420", 0x4149, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
{ "vt8237", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
{ "vt8235", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8235, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
{ "vt8233a", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8233A, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
@@ -635,9 +636,10 @@
}

static struct pci_device_id via_pci_tbl[] = {
- { PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C576_1, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0},
- { PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_1, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0},
- { 0, },
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C576_1) },
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_82C586_1) },
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, 0x4149) },
+ { }, /* terminate list */
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, via_pci_tbl);