* [patch] nicksched for 2.6.11
@ 2005-03-02 11:14 Nick Piggin
2005-03-05 11:51 ` Prakash Punnoor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nick Piggin @ 2005-03-02 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I've had a few queries about this, so by "popular" demand, I've
put my latest nicksched stuff here:
www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.11-nicksched.gz
It includes all the multiprocessor stuff that's in -mm, and also
my alternate scheduler policy.
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] nicksched for 2.6.11
2005-03-02 11:14 [patch] nicksched for 2.6.11 Nick Piggin
@ 2005-03-05 11:51 ` Prakash Punnoor
2005-03-07 6:02 ` Nick Piggin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Prakash Punnoor @ 2005-03-05 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Piggin; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 425 bytes --]
Nick Piggin schrieb:
> I've had a few queries about this, so by "popular" demand, I've
> put my latest nicksched stuff here:
>
> www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.11-nicksched.gz
>
> It includes all the multiprocessor stuff that's in -mm, and also
> my alternate scheduler policy.
Hi,
just to make sure, is it still advised to renice X when using your scheduler?
--
Prakash Punnoor
formerly known as Prakash K. Cheemplavam
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] nicksched for 2.6.11
2005-03-05 11:51 ` Prakash Punnoor
@ 2005-03-07 6:02 ` Nick Piggin
2005-03-07 13:45 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nick Piggin @ 2005-03-07 6:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Prakash Punnoor; +Cc: linux-kernel
Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> Nick Piggin schrieb:
>
>>I've had a few queries about this, so by "popular" demand, I've
>>put my latest nicksched stuff here:
>>
>>www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/2.6.11-nicksched.gz
>>
>>It includes all the multiprocessor stuff that's in -mm, and also
>>my alternate scheduler policy.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> just to make sure, is it still advised to renice X when using your scheduler?
>
Yes it is. I have a hack in there that automatically renices any
binary starting with 'XF' to -10 for people who forget. So this
includes XFree86, though maybe it doesn't get the x.org server?
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] nicksched for 2.6.11
2005-03-07 6:02 ` Nick Piggin
@ 2005-03-07 13:45 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Felipe Alfaro Solana @ 2005-03-07 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Piggin; +Cc: Prakash Punnoor, linux-kernel
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:02:43 +1100, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Yes it is. I have a hack in there that automatically renices any
> binary starting with 'XF' to -10 for people who forget. So this
> includes XFree86, though maybe it doesn't get the x.org server?
X.org's X server binary is called "Xorg", though sometimes it's called
"X" (a symbolic link to Xorg).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-07 13:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-02 11:14 [patch] nicksched for 2.6.11 Nick Piggin
2005-03-05 11:51 ` Prakash Punnoor
2005-03-07 6:02 ` Nick Piggin
2005-03-07 13:45 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox