From: Jindrich Makovicka <makovick@kmlinux.fjfi.cvut.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.11-rc4-mm1: something is wrong with swsusp powerdown
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 13:38:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4227053F.9050305@kmlinux.fjfi.cvut.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050302163008.322031d3.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> (Please do reply-to-all)
>
> Jindrich Makovicka <makovick@kmlinux.fjfi.cvut.cz> wrote:
>
>>Pavel Machek wrote:
>>
>>>Hi!
>>>
>>>In `subj` kernel, machine no longer powers down at the end of
>>>swsusp. 2.6.11-rc5-pavel works ok, as does 2.6.11-bk.
>>
>>For me, power down stopped working since the introduction of softlockup
>>detection. After disabling CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP, powerdown works fine.
>
>
> Could you send the output which CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP generates?
>
> I had one CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP failure with suspend, on SMP. The
> machine was stuck somewhere under mce_work_fn(). Perhaps in the
> smp_call_function(). It only happened the once.
Strange enough, softlockup produces no additional output. Kernel just
prints "acpi_power_off called" and freezes. Without softlockup detection
compiled in it turns off normally.
First I was under impression that this is caused by
acpi_power_off-bug-fix.patch mentioned above, but unfortunately removing
it didn't actually solve the problem. Later I found I missed that
softlockup detection sneaked in turned on by default, and disabling it
made power off work again.
Power down via APM produced some softlockup output, but I am not sure if
APM actually worked on my machine before - I just tried APM if it works
when ACPI doesn't, and didn't bother taking a snapshot. I can recompile
an APM kernel with softlockup enabled and disabled and test it, if it
could help.
--
Jindrich Makovicka
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-03 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-28 23:17 2.6.11-rc4-mm1: something is wrong with swsusp powerdown Pavel Machek
2005-03-01 6:38 ` Laurent Riffard
2005-03-01 9:52 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-01 10:54 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-01 11:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-03-01 12:02 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-01 11:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-03-01 12:08 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-01 17:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-03-01 10:07 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-01 10:21 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-01 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-01 20:35 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-01 23:39 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-01 10:48 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-01 13:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-01 13:12 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-01 20:38 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-02 22:57 ` Jindrich Makovicka
2005-03-03 0:30 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-03 12:38 ` Jindrich Makovicka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4227053F.9050305@kmlinux.fjfi.cvut.cz \
--to=makovick@kmlinux.fjfi.cvut.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox