public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eugeny S. Mints" <emints@ru.mvista.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, deactivate() scheduling issue
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 22:36:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42276746.6060600@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050210075234.GC9436@elte.hu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2025 bytes --]

please consider the following scenario for full RT kernel.

Task A is running then an irq is occured which in turn wakes up irq 
related thread (B) of a higher priority than A.

my current understanding that actual context switch between A and B will 
occure at preempt_schedule_irq() on the "return form irq " path.

in this case the following "if" statement in __schedule() always returns 
false since  preempt_schedule_irq() always sets up  PREEMPT_ACTIVE 
before __schedule() call.

         if ((prev->state & ~TASK_RUNNING_MUTEX) &&
                         !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)) {

as result the deactivate() is never called for preempted task A in this 
scenario. BUt if the task A is preempted while not in TASK_RUNNING state 
such behaviour seems incorrect since we get a task in not TASK_RUNNING 
state linked into a run queue.

An example:

drivers/net/irda/sir_dev.c: 76 (2.6.10 kernel)

         spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->tx_lock, flags); /* serialize th other 
tx operations */
         while (dev->tx_buff.len > 0) {    /* wait until tx idle */
                 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->tx_lock, flags);
76:             set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
                 schedule_timeout(msecs_to_jiffies(10));
                 spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->tx_lock, flags);
         }

At  line 76 irqs are enabled, preemption is enabled.
Let assume the task A executes this code and gets preempted right after 
line 76. Task state is TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE but it will not be 
deactevated. Of cource this is the bug in set_current_state() 
utilization in this particular driver but schedule stuff should be 
robust to such bugs I believe. There are a lot such bugs in the kernel I 
believe.

Not sure what the actual reason for !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)) 
   condition is but if it's just a sort of optimization (not remove a 
task from run queue if it was preemped in TASK_RUNNING state) then 
probably it should be removed in order to save correctness. Patch attached.

	Eugeny


[-- Attachment #2: sched.c.deactivate.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 503 bytes --]

--- sched.c.orig	2005-03-03 22:35:16.000000000 +0300
+++ sched.c	2005-03-03 22:34:58.000000000 +0300
@@ -2891,8 +2891,7 @@
 	spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
 
 	switch_count = &prev->nvcsw; // TODO: temporary - to see it in vmstat
-	if ((prev->state & ~TASK_RUNNING_MUTEX) &&
-                       !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)) {
+	if ((prev->state & ~TASK_RUNNING_MUTEX)) {
  		switch_count = &prev->nvcsw;
 		if (unlikely((prev->state & TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) &&
 				unlikely(signal_pending(prev))))

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-03 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-04 10:03 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01 Ingo Molnar
2005-02-04 15:19 ` Kevin Hilman
2005-02-04 17:30   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-04 18:19 ` Tom Rini
2005-02-07  9:03   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-07 14:35     ` Tom Rini
2005-02-08  8:27       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-06  4:19 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-07  9:21   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-07 15:08     ` Real-Time Preemption and UML? Esben Nielsen
2005-02-07 18:35       ` Jeff Dike
2005-02-07 23:14         ` Esben Nielsen
2005-02-08  8:39           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-08 18:55             ` Jeff Dike
2005-02-08 21:20               ` Esben Nielsen
2005-02-08 21:44                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-08 23:02                   ` Esben Nielsen
2005-02-08  7:55 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01 Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-08  8:45   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-08 10:26     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-02-08 21:58 ` William Weston
2005-02-09 11:51   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-10  2:13     ` William Weston
2005-02-10  7:52       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-10 20:21         ` George Anzinger
2005-02-10 20:40           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-10 21:05             ` George Anzinger
2005-02-11  8:34               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-11  9:38                 ` Sven Dietrich
2005-02-11  9:42                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-11  0:09           ` Sven Dietrich
2005-02-11  6:01             ` George Anzinger
2005-02-11  8:28             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-11  9:53               ` Sven Dietrich
2005-02-11 10:04                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-11 21:49                   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-02-13 12:59                     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-13 15:11                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-03 19:36         ` Eugeny S. Mints [this message]
2005-03-03 22:32           ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, deactivate() scheduling issue Esben Nielsen
2005-03-04 11:56             ` Eugeny S. Mints
2005-03-04 15:45               ` George Anzinger
2005-03-29  8:45           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-09 12:48   ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-rc3-V0.7.38-01 Stephen Smalley
2005-02-10  2:20     ` William Weston
2005-02-19  5:08 ` Lee Revell
2005-02-19  6:47   ` Lee Revell
2005-02-19  9:00   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-19  9:03     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-19 20:45       ` Lee Revell
2005-02-20  0:19         ` Lee Revell
2005-03-17 16:33         ` Lee Revell
2005-02-23  2:22       ` Lee Revell
2005-03-10  9:37   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-10  9:54     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11  9:57       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-11 10:15         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 10:17           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-11 10:24             ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 10:43               ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-11 10:53                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 14:40                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 15:08                   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 15:30                     ` K.R. Foley
2005-03-11 15:38                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-11 16:01                     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 20:39                     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11 20:46                       ` Lee Revell
2005-03-11 22:06                         ` Lee Revell
2005-03-14  7:37                           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-14  9:33                             ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-14 10:10                               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-14 15:50                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-14 19:02                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 11:44                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 12:00                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-15 13:07                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 13:35                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-15 13:55                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 19:12                                             ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-15 18:05                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-15 19:09                                             ` Lee Revell
2005-03-16  7:50                                               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 18:21                                                 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-16  7:31                                             ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16  8:50                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16  9:15                                               ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16  9:51                                                 ` [patch 0/3] j_state_lock, j_list_lock, remove-bitlocks Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16  9:53                                                   ` [patch 1/3] j_state_lock -> j_state_sem Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16  9:53                                                     ` [patch 2/3] j_list_lock -> j_list_sem Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16  9:57                                                       ` [patch 3/3] remove bitlocks Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:04                                                   ` [patch 0/3] j_state_lock, j_list_lock, remove-bitlocks Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 10:12                                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:23                                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 10:26                                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:26                                                       ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 10:29                                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:41                                                           ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 10:34                                                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-03-16 10:19                                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 10:40                                                       ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 10:51                                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-16 11:05                                                         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 11:19                                                           ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 14:04                                                             ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 16:47                                                               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 17:47                                                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-16 19:20                                                                   ` Lee Revell
2005-03-17  7:15                                                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-17 15:41                                                                       ` Lee Revell
2005-03-17 16:23                                                                         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-17 16:36                                                                           ` Lee Revell
2005-03-18  6:58                                                                             ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-18 18:19                                                                               ` Lee Revell
2005-03-16 21:15                                                                   ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-17  9:21                                                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-18  9:23                                                                       ` [PATCH] remove lame schedule in journal inverted_lock (was: Re: [patch 0/3] j_state_lock, j_list_lock, remove-bitlocks) Steven Rostedt
2005-03-18  9:32                                                                         ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18 10:38                                                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-18 11:07                                                                             ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18 12:10                                                                               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-17  9:58                                                                   ` [patch 0/3] j_state_lock, j_list_lock, remove-bitlocks Steven Rostedt
2005-03-11  9:28 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.11-final-V0.7.40-00 Ingo Molnar
2005-03-11 12:10   ` Andrew Walrond
2005-03-14 20:19     ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42276746.6060600@ru.mvista.com \
    --to=emints@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox