From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Rene Rebe <rene@exactcode.de>,
torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trivial fix for 2.6.11 raid6 compilation on ppc w/ Altivec
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 14:48:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42276A0C.9080505@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050303191840.GA12916@kroah.com>
Greg KH wrote:
Two procedural suggestions...
> Ok, I've fixed up the patch and applied it to a local tree that I've set
> up to catch these things (it will live at
> bk://kernel.bkbits.net:gregkh/linux-2.6.11.y until Chris Wright and I
> set up how we are going to handle all of this.)
My suggestion would be one of two alternatives:
1) At each release, Linus clones
linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.6
to
linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.6.11
and gives the "release team" access to push to linux-2.6.11 repo.
2) Create linux-release.bkbits.net, and some non-Linus person clones
linux-2.6 at release time to linux-2.6.11.
This accomplishes two [minor] goals:
a) the tree lives at bkbits.net, as has a name associated with the goal
of the project
b) The repo has the _exact_ name of the kernel release. None of this
"linux-2.6.11.y" stuff. Just "linux-2.6.11". Anything else violates
the Principle of Least Surprise.
> Feel free to start pointing stuff like this at me and chris (we'll also
> be setting up an alias for it.)
I was wondering if it would be possible to setup a list on vger that is
public, but read-only to everyone but the $sucker team.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-03 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-03 18:05 [PATCH] trivial fix for 2.6.11 raid6 compilation on ppc w/ Altivec Rene Rebe
2005-03-03 18:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-03 18:48 ` Greg KH
2005-03-03 18:59 ` Rene Rebe
2005-03-03 19:18 ` Greg KH
2005-03-03 19:48 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-03-03 20:07 ` Chris Wright
2005-03-03 20:32 ` Greg KH
2005-03-03 20:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 12:10 ` Francois Romieu
2005-03-03 22:30 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-03-03 22:45 ` Greg KH
2005-03-03 23:05 ` Dave Jones
2005-03-03 22:55 ` Olof Johansson
2005-03-03 23:14 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 1:59 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 2:24 ` Olof Johansson
2005-03-04 5:54 ` Chris Wright
2005-03-04 6:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 6:17 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 6:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 6:06 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 6:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 6:20 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 6:20 ` Chris Wright
2005-03-04 6:23 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 6:47 ` Chris Wright
2005-03-04 6:54 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 7:04 ` Chris Wright
2005-03-04 7:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 7:12 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 7:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 16:27 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 18:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-04 18:41 ` Greg KH
2005-03-06 23:06 ` Alan Cox
2005-03-07 18:03 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42276A0C.9080505@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rene@exactcode.de \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox