public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "L. A. Walsh" <lkml@tlinx.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.11.1
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:32:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4229FB57.70309@tlinx.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050304175302.GA29289@kroah.com>

Many, many thanks...it's a great idea and seems to go well
with Linus's idea of making even releases "hyper-stable".

This is exactly what I was looking for in
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/268836)

Sorry some of you feel like "suckers"...but you're _not_.
You're heroes -- doing the hard sh*t that most programmers
don't want to be bothered with.  I salute you!

Linda W.

Greg KH wrote:

>For those of you who haven't waded through the huge "RFD: Kernel release
>numbering" thread on lkml to realize that we are now going to start
>putting out 2.6.x.y releases, here's the summary:
>
>	A few of us $suckers will be trying to maintain a 2.6.x.y set of
>	releases that happen after 2.6.x is released.  It will contain
>	only a set of bugfixes and security fixes that meet a strict set
>	of guidelines, as defined by Linus at:
>		http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/283396
>
>Chris Wright and I are going to start working on doing this work, we
>will have a <SOME_ALIAS>@kernel.org to post these types of bug fixes to,
>and a set of people we bounce the patches off of to test for "smells
>good" validation.  We will also have a bk-commits type mailing list for
>those who want to watch the patches flow in, and a bk tree from which
>changsets can be pulled from.
>
>Chris and I will be hashing all of the details out next Tuesday, and
>hopefully all the infrastructure will be in place soon.  When that
>happens, we will post the full details on how all of this is going to
>work.  In the meantime, feel free to CC: me and Chris on patches that
>everyone thinks should go into the 2.6.11.y releases.
>
>But right now, Chris is on a plane, and we don't have the email alias
>set up, or the proper permissions set up on kernel.org to push changes
>into the v2.6 directory, but we have a few bugs that are needing to be
>fixed in the 2.6.11 release.  And since our mantra is, "release early
>and often", here's the first release.
>
>---------------
>
>I've released the 2.6.11.1 patch:
>	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/v2.6.11/patch-2.6.11.1.gz
>
>With a detailed changelog at:
>	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/v2.6.11/ChangeLog-2.6.11.1
>
>A bitkeeper tree for the 2.6.11.y releases can be found at:
>	bk://linux-release.bkbits.net/linux-2.6.11
>
>The diffstat and short summary of the fixes are below.  
>
>I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch itself,
>as it is small enough to do so.
>
>thanks,
>
>greg k-h
>
>-------
>
> Makefile                              |    2 +-
> drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h |    6 +++---
> drivers/md/raid6altivec.uc            |    4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>
>Summary of changes from v2.6.11 to v2.6.11.1
>============================================
>
>Dmitry Torokhov:
>  o Fix keyboards for Dell machines
>
>Greg Kroah-Hartman:
>  o Linux 2.6.11.1
>
>Olof Johansson:
>  o Fix for trivial fix for 2.6.11 raid6 compilation on ppc w/ Altivec
>
>Rene Rebe:
>  o trivial fix for 2.6.11 raid6 compilation on ppc w/ Altivec
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>  
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-05 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-04 17:53 Linux 2.6.11.1 Greg KH
2005-03-04 17:53 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 20:34 ` Ian Pilcher
2005-03-04 22:29   ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 20:58   ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 21:15     ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 21:43       ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 21:54         ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 22:08           ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 21:53       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-04 21:59         ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 22:05           ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 22:36             ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-05  0:06               ` Greg KH
2005-03-05  0:28                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-05  7:53                   ` Dave Jones
2005-03-06  5:05                     ` Greg KH
2005-03-05  1:37                 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-06  5:03                   ` Greg KH
2005-03-05  9:51             ` Russell King
2005-03-05 17:19               ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-05 17:40                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-05 17:46                   ` Russell King
2005-03-05 21:17                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-05 21:49                       ` Gene Heskett
2005-03-05 22:06                         ` Lee Revell
2005-03-05 23:26                           ` Gene Heskett
2005-03-07 17:18                           ` Alan Cox
2005-03-08 20:16                             ` Lee Revell
2005-03-05 17:50                   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-05 18:22                   ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-03-05  0:24       ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 21:15   ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-04 21:33   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 21:51     ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 21:58       ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-05  7:11         ` James Bourne
2005-03-08 22:07     ` Bill Davidsen
2005-03-08 22:41       ` Chris Wright
2005-03-04 21:50   ` Dave Jones
2005-03-04 23:35   ` Andries Brouwer
2005-03-04 20:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-04 20:53   ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 21:02     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-05 18:32 ` L. A. Walsh [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-04 19:28 Paolo
2005-03-04 19:55 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 20:01   ` Paolo
2005-03-04 20:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-05  6:16 Shawn Starr
2005-03-06  5:06 ` Greg KH
2005-03-07  4:01   ` Shawn Starr
2005-03-07  3:58     ` Randy.Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4229FB57.70309@tlinx.org \
    --to=lkml@tlinx.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox