Re: Linux 2.6.11.1

Jeff Garzik
2005-03-05T02:22:52Z

Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:36:14PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>>But we end up with a cset in the permanent kernel history which simply
>>should not have been there.
>
>
> Is this really a big deal?

If you are pushing linux-release to Linus/Andrew rapidly, quick fixes
will land in linux-2.6 rapidly, and more invasive stuff will land only
in linux-2.6 when the invasive stuff is ready to go. It even takes the
pressure off pushing invasive stuff ASAP.

Have you pushed linux-2.6.11.1 upstream yet? :)

Jeff