Re: Linux 2.6.11.2

Pavel Machek
2005-03-09T11:14:41Z

On St 09-03-05 09:52:46, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote:
>
> >which is a patch against the 2.6.11.1 release. If consensus arrives
> >that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that
> >way in the future.
>
> IMHO it sould be against 2.6.11 and not 2.6.11.1, like -rc's that are'nt
> againt
> the last -rc but against 2.6.x.

You expect people to go through all 2.6.11.1, 2.6.11.2, ... . That
means .11.2 should be relative to .11.1, because otherwise people will
have to revert (ugly). And you want people to track -stable kernels as
fast as possible.

So Greg did it right.
Pavel
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!