public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: "Moore, Eric Dean" <Eric.Moore@lsil.com>,
	mpt_linux_developer@lsil.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Shirron, Stephen" <Stephen.Shirron@lsil.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6: unused code under drivers/message/fusion/
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:51:05 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4235CF09.3090903@vlnb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050312113142.GB3156@stusta.de>

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 12:58:47PM +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> 
>>Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 11:11:51AM +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Moore, Eric Dean wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>We need to hold off on this change. Yes, there are 
>>>>>customers of LSI Logic using mptstm.c, as
>>>>>part of the target-mode drivers.  
>>>>>
>>>>>The proposed generic target mode drivers proposal is yet part
>>>>>of the kernel.  
>>>>>http://scst.sourceforge.net/
>>>>>We are looking into supporting this once its available.
>>>>
>>>>Well, SCST is already available, stable and useful. People use it 
>>>>without considerable problems, except with inconvenient LUNs management, 
>>>>which we are going to fix in the next version. I don't expect it will be 
>>>>considering for the kernel inclusion at least until 2.7. So, you can 
>>>>start supporting it right now :-).
>>>
>>>
>>>With the current kernel development model, there is no 2.7 planned for 
>>>the next years.
>>>
>>>Linus and Andrew believe 6 was an odd number, so you could submit your 
>>>code now. [1]
>>
>>OK, I'll prepare the next version as the kernel patch.
> 
> 
> Any news regarding this?

Unfortunately, I have not much time for it now, so I can't expect
release of 0.9.3 version, which is going to have the patch, earlier than
in May. But I'm ready to publish 0.9.3-pre1 as well as some bugfixes in
the Qlogic driver in the nearest future, as soon as I settle down some
untechnical stuff. If somebody is interested, I can send him a copy
privately. As before, it still has ZERO modifications of the kernel, so
it could live perfectly outside the tree.

Also, everybody who think that he/she can help in testing,
developing, bugfixing or just commenting/suggesting are welcome.

Vlad






  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-14 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-08 23:12 2.6: unused code under drivers/message/fusion/ Moore, Eric Dean
2004-11-10  8:11 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2004-11-10  9:40   ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-10  9:58     ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2005-03-12 11:31       ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-14 17:51         ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin [this message]
2005-03-14 17:55         ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2004-11-10  9:41 ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4235CF09.3090903@vlnb.net \
    --to=vst@vlnb.net \
    --cc=Eric.Moore@lsil.com \
    --cc=Stephen.Shirron@lsil.com \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpt_linux_developer@lsil.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox