From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: "Moore, Eric Dean" <Eric.Moore@lsil.com>,
mpt_linux_developer@lsil.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Shirron, Stephen" <Stephen.Shirron@lsil.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6: unused code under drivers/message/fusion/
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 20:55:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4235CFFD.1040006@vlnb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050312113142.GB3156@stusta.de>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 12:58:47PM +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>
>>Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 11:11:51AM +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Moore, Eric Dean wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>We need to hold off on this change. Yes, there are
>>>>>customers of LSI Logic using mptstm.c, as
>>>>>part of the target-mode drivers.
>>>>>
>>>>>The proposed generic target mode drivers proposal is yet part
>>>>>of the kernel.
>>>>>http://scst.sourceforge.net/
>>>>>We are looking into supporting this once its available.
>>>>
>>>>Well, SCST is already available, stable and useful. People use it
>>>>without considerable problems, except with inconvenient LUNs management,
>>>>which we are going to fix in the next version. I don't expect it will be
>>>>considering for the kernel inclusion at least until 2.7. So, you can
>>>>start supporting it right now :-).
>>>
>>>
>>>With the current kernel development model, there is no 2.7 planned for
>>>the next years.
>>>
>>>Linus and Andrew believe 6 was an odd number, so you could submit your
>>>code now. [1]
>>
>>OK, I'll prepare the next version as the kernel patch.
>
>
> Any news regarding this?
Unfortunately, I have not much time for it now, so I can't expect
release of 0.9.3 version, which is going to have the patch, earlier than
in May. But I'm ready to publish 0.9.3-pre1 as well as some bugfixes in
the Qlogic driver in the nearest future, as soon as I settle down some
untechnical stuff. If somebody is interested, I can send him a copy
privately. As before, it still has ZERO modifications of the kernel, so
it could live perfectly outside the tree.
Also, everybody who think that he/she can help in testing,
developing, bugfixing or just commenting/suggesting are welcome.
Vlad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-14 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-08 23:12 2.6: unused code under drivers/message/fusion/ Moore, Eric Dean
2004-11-10 8:11 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2004-11-10 9:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-10 9:58 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2005-03-12 11:31 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-14 17:51 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2005-03-14 17:55 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin [this message]
2004-11-10 9:41 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4235CFFD.1040006@vlnb.net \
--to=vst@vlnb.net \
--cc=Eric.Moore@lsil.com \
--cc=Stephen.Shirron@lsil.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpt_linux_developer@lsil.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox