From: Christian Kujau <evil@g-house.de>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Mauricio Lin <mauriciolin@gmail.com>, elenstev@mesatop.com
Subject: Re: oom with 2.6.11
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:12:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4236ED5F.9020301@g-house.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f250c7105031500527007a0e7@mail.gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mauricio Lin wrote:
>>>
>>>Did this problem start from 2.6.11-rc2-bk10?
>>
>>i noticed it first at 2.6.11, then again with 2.6.11-rc5-bk2. suspecting
>>pppd to be the culprit to chew up all RAM after being terminated by my ISP
>>once a day - i just have to wait (must be around 2a.m.).
>
> Have you tried with 2.6.10 in order to check this problem?
i don't think i've run plain 2.6.10 at all, syslog does not say so. i've
run several versions of 2.6.9, then 2.6.10-rc1, 2.6.10-rc1-bk19,
2.6.10-rc2-bk9, 2.6.10-rc3-bk11, 2.6.11-rc2-bk10, 2.6.11-rc5-bk2.
as stated earlier, the problem kicked in when i switched to 2.6.11, i
switched back to 2.6.11-rc5-bk2 and it happened again. by looking at the
syslog i am (still) suspecting pppd to be the source of OOM, but it did
not show up as a memory pig in "ps". i am running 2.6.11.3 now and the
machine survived almost 2 passes of pppd's daily hangups. i'll keep an eye
on it.
thank you for your concern,
Christian.
- --
BOFH excuse #357:
I'd love to help you -- it's just that the Boss won't let me near the
computer.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCNu1e+A7rjkF8z0wRAmSPAJ49erb21bO6inHPn/zoUH2gNHJk8QCguYDA
HyzXS9whrJnb9eXVz9IP8zc=
=zhEx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-15 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-08 15:21 oom with 2.6.11 Christian Kujau
2005-03-09 13:18 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-03-09 13:41 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-03-09 14:00 ` Christian Kujau
2005-03-10 15:12 ` Christian Kujau
2005-03-11 0:39 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-11 1:14 ` Christian Kujau
2005-03-11 7:45 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2005-03-11 9:01 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-03-11 15:09 ` Christian Kujau
2005-03-15 8:52 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-03-15 14:12 ` Christian Kujau [this message]
2005-03-20 14:35 ` [SOLVED] " Christian Kujau
2005-03-11 10:59 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-03-11 15:10 ` Christian Kujau
2005-03-12 18:06 ` Christian Kujau
2005-03-17 1:27 ` Christian Kujau
2005-03-17 1:51 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-17 2:00 ` Christian Kujau
2005-03-17 21:25 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-03-18 1:59 ` Christian Kujau
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-09 13:22 OOM " Christian Kujau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4236ED5F.9020301@g-house.de \
--to=evil@g-house.de \
--cc=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mauriciolin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox