From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261395AbVCRAI5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:08:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261390AbVCRAI5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:08:57 -0500 Received: from li-22.members.linode.com ([64.5.53.22]:14996 "EHLO www.cryptography.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261395AbVCRAIw (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:08:52 -0500 Message-ID: <423A1BED.1010608@root.org> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:08:13 -0800 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Garrett CC: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ACPI] IDE failure on ACPI resume References: <1110741241.8136.46.camel@tyrosine> <423518E7.3030300@root.org> <1111072221.8136.171.camel@tyrosine> <4239E9BA.7050105@root.org> <1111104154.8136.179.camel@tyrosine> In-Reply-To: <1111104154.8136.179.camel@tyrosine> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 12:34 -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: >>Very interesting. I was hoping to someday have _GTF et al implemented >>but the ATA knowledge required was above my head. I also strongly >>suspected that the info published by _GTF would likely be invalid. Does >>Windows actually use that method or just hardcoded ATA initialization? > > I believe that Windows does use the _GTF methods. You are correct. A quick scan of my w2k drivers shows atapi.sys uses the _GTF, _GTM, and _STM methods. -- Nate