public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Erik Andrén" <erik.andren@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Suspend-to-disk woes
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:28:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <423B01A3.8090501@gmail.com> (raw)

Hello, I experienced a pretty nasty problem a couple of days back:

I ran 2.6.11-ck1 and built 2.6.11-ck2. The last thing I did before 
booting the new kernel was to suspend-to-disk the old kernel (something 
I usually do as I'm working on this laptop).
I ran the new kernel a couple of days and decided to boot the old kernel 
to do some performance tests. Imagine my dread as the old kernel instead 
of detecting that the system has booted another kernel just reloads the 
old suspend-to-disk image. The result is that after succesfully 
resuming, my harddrive goes bonkers and starts to work. After a couple 
of minutes the whole kernel hangs. I reboot and try to boot the -ck2 
kernel again only to find that the system complains as it finds missing 
nodes. The reisertools try to rebuild the system unsucessully. The 
--rebuild-tree parameter worked but a lot of files were still missing. 
In the end I had to reinstall the whole system as it went so unstable.

My question is: Why isn't there a check before resuming a 
suspend-to-disk image if the system has booted another kernel since the 
suspend to prevent this kind of hassle?
//Regards Erik Andrén

Please cc me as I'm not on the lkml list yadda yadda


             reply	other threads:[~2005-03-18 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-18 16:28 Erik Andrén [this message]
2005-03-18 17:54 ` Suspend-to-disk woes Stefan Seyfried
2005-03-18 22:04 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-19 13:26 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-19 20:20   ` Russell Miller
2005-03-19 21:29     ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-19 21:44       ` Russell Miller
2005-03-21  0:14       ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-21  0:17         ` Matthew Garrett
2005-03-21  5:59           ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-21  9:33             ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-03-21 21:38               ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-03-21  7:38         ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-03-21 11:23           ` Nigel Cunningham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=423B01A3.8090501@gmail.com \
    --to=erik.andren@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox