From: Richard Fuchs <richard.fuchs@inode.info>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: /proc/$pid/mem
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 10:08:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <423BEC0E.300@inode.info> (raw)
Aloha!
I know it has been discussed before, but I must express my feelings
about this issue nonetheless. I find it a major pain in the back that
/proc/$pid/mem isn't readable by an unrelated process without doing a
PTRACE_ATTACH first.
I mainly want to ask: is there a good reason to not drop this restriction?
I can read all the machine's physical memory and all of the kernel's
address space (/dev/mem, /proc/kcore) non-intrusively, but I can't do
the same on a single process. It seems to me that /proc/$pid/mem should
work analogous to /dev/mem or /proc/kcore, but currently in practice it
doesn't, and I don't see a good reason why it is supposed to be that way.
Cheers
Richard
reply other threads:[~2005-03-19 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=423BEC0E.300@inode.info \
--to=richard.fuchs@inode.info \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox