* Status of SATA support
@ 2005-03-21 11:44 Carlos Fernandez Sanz
2005-03-21 12:35 ` Raphael Jacquot
2005-03-21 17:54 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Fernandez Sanz @ 2005-03-21 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Since this document is a bit our of date:
http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html
What's the best supported brand and/or model of SATA/RAID controllers
which do not suck?
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of SATA support
2005-03-21 11:44 Status of SATA support Carlos Fernandez Sanz
@ 2005-03-21 12:35 ` Raphael Jacquot
2005-03-21 17:54 ` Jeff Garzik
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Raphael Jacquot @ 2005-03-21 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Fernandez Sanz; +Cc: linux-kernel
Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote:
> Since this document is a bit our of date:
>
> http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html
>
> What's the best supported brand and/or model of SATA/RAID controllers
> which do not suck?
>
> Thanks.
3ware works well for me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of SATA support
2005-03-21 11:44 Status of SATA support Carlos Fernandez Sanz
2005-03-21 12:35 ` Raphael Jacquot
@ 2005-03-21 17:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-21 18:01 ` Andre Tomt
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2005-03-21 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Fernandez Sanz; +Cc: linux-kernel
Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote:
> Since this document is a bit our of date:
>
> http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html
What's out-of-date about that URL?
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of SATA support
2005-03-21 17:54 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2005-03-21 18:01 ` Andre Tomt
2005-03-21 18:10 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andre Tomt @ 2005-03-21 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Carlos Fernandez Sanz, linux-kernel
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote:
>
>> Since this document is a bit our of date:
>>
>> http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html
>
>
> What's out-of-date about that URL?
>
> Jeff
>
A update on the Marvell status? :-P
Anyway, is there any of the current work on Marvell available somewhere,
so that someone could possibly pick up on it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of SATA support
2005-03-21 18:01 ` Andre Tomt
@ 2005-03-21 18:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-21 19:12 ` Andre Tomt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2005-03-21 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andre Tomt; +Cc: Carlos Fernandez Sanz, linux-kernel
Andre Tomt wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>> Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote:
>>
>>> Since this document is a bit our of date:
>>>
>>> http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html
>>
>>
>>
>> What's out-of-date about that URL?
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>
> A update on the Marvell status? :-P
No Marvell status change, so no need to update...
> Anyway, is there any of the current work on Marvell available somewhere,
> so that someone could possibly pick up on it?
It's mainly a skeleton that I would rather not release. Someone with
docs (and you need docs) could re-create it in ten seconds.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of SATA support
2005-03-21 18:10 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2005-03-21 19:12 ` Andre Tomt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andre Tomt @ 2005-03-21 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Carlos Fernandez Sanz, linux-kernel
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andre Tomt wrote:
>
>> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>
>>> Carlos Fernandez Sanz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Since this document is a bit our of date:
>>>>
>>>> http://linux.yyz.us/sata/sata-status.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What's out-of-date about that URL?
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>
>> A update on the Marvell status? :-P
>
> No Marvell status change, so no need to update...
My main point is that if its listed as "in progress", other parties that
are interrested in developing a driver would most likely think it is on
the way and thus just wait it out instead. We both know it has stalled ;-)
>> Anyway, is there any of the current work on Marvell available
>> somewhere, so that someone could possibly pick up on it?
>
> It's mainly a skeleton that I would rather not release. Someone with
> docs (and you need docs) could re-create it in ten seconds.
Whats missing? Manpower? Hardware?
Are anyone planning AHCI based PCI-X/PCI-E boards? :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-21 19:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-21 11:44 Status of SATA support Carlos Fernandez Sanz
2005-03-21 12:35 ` Raphael Jacquot
2005-03-21 17:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-21 18:01 ` Andre Tomt
2005-03-21 18:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-21 19:12 ` Andre Tomt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox