public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Yum Rayan <yum.rayan@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in module.c
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:01:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <424AE960.8020906@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df35dfeb050329222132823897@mail.gmail.com>

Yum Rayan wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:43:12 -0800, Randy.Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org> wrote:
> 
>>Yum Rayan wrote:
>>
>>>Attempt to reduce stack usage in module.c (linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3).
>>>Specifically from checkstack.pl
> 
>>>Also while at it, fix following in who_is_doing_it(...)
>>>- use only as much memory is needed
>>>- do not write past array index for the boundary case
>>
>>I don't see a boundary case problem with the current code,
>>hence I don't see why the kmalloc(len + 1, GFP_KERNEL) is
>>needed...
> 
> 
> Let's consider the original code and len = 513
> 
>    1399 static void who_is_doing_it(void)
>    1400 {
>    1401         /* Print out all the args. */
>    1402         char args[512];
>    1403         unsigned long i, len = current->mm->arg_end -
> current->mm->arg_start;
>    1404
>    1405         if (len > 512)
>    1406                 len = 512;
>    1407
>    1408         len -= copy_from_user(args, (void
> *)current->mm->arg_start, len);
>    1409
>    1410         for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>    1411                 if (args[i] == '\0')
>    1412                         args[i] = ' ';
>    1413         }
>    1414         args[i] = 0;
>    1415         printk("ARGS: %s\n", args);
>    1416 }
> 
> After lines 1410 thru 1413, "i" wil be 512. So line 1414 will be
> "args[512] = 0". But args is 512 byte array with last legally
> accessible element at 511?

Yes, it's so obvious (now).  :)

>>File names start one level deeper than wanted.  They should begin
>>with linux/ or a/ or ./ e.g.
>>There are plenty of docs on this, please let me know if you need
>>references to them.
> 
> 
> Point noted. Will post patch to linux/Documentation/SubmittingPatches,
> hopefully making it more clear. Reworked patch at end of email.

Good idea, thanks.

-- 
~Randy

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-30 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-29  7:13 [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in module.c Yum Rayan
2005-03-29 17:43 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-03-30  6:21   ` Yum Rayan
2005-03-30 18:01     ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2005-03-30 19:44       ` Jesper Juhl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=424AE960.8020906@osdl.org \
    --to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=yum.rayan@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox