public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Cc: Yum Rayan <yum.rayan@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mvw@planets.elm.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in acct.c
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:09:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <424C5912.90607@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050331150548.GC19294@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>

Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Wed, 30 March 2005 23:39:40 -0800, Yum Rayan wrote:
> 
>>Before patch
>>------------
>>check_free_space - 128
>>do_acct_process - 105
>>
>>After patch
>>-----------
>>check_free_space - 36
>>do_acct_process - 44
> 
> 
> It is always nice to see enthusiams, but in your case it might be a
> bit misguided.  None of the functions you worked on appear to be real
> problems wrt. stack usage.

Yes, this is similar to what I was about to write.
It would be more useful to tackle the really large stack consumers
or ones in deep call chains.

> But if you have time to tackle some of these functions, that may make
> a real difference:
> 
> http://wh.fh-wedel.de/~joern/stackcheck.2.6.11
> 
> In principle, all recursive paths should consume as little stack as
> possible.  Or the recursion itself could be avoided, even better.  And
> some of the call chains with ~3k of stack consumption may be
> problematic on other platforms, like the x86-64.  Taking care of those
> could result in smaller stacks for the respective platform.

Here is 2.6.12-rc1-bk3 raw checkstack output on x86-64:
http://developer.osdl.org/~rddunlap/doc/checkstack1.out

-- 
~Randy

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-31 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-31  7:39 [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in acct.c Yum Rayan
2005-03-31 15:05 ` Jörn Engel
2005-03-31 20:09   ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2005-03-31 20:40     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-31 20:30   ` Stack usage tasks Adrian Bunk
2005-03-31 20:43     ` Roland Dreier
2005-03-31 21:19       ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-01 10:17         ` Jörn Engel
2005-04-01 11:16           ` Jörn Engel
2005-04-03 11:35 ` [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in acct.c Olaf Dietsche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=424C5912.90607@osdl.org \
    --to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mvw@planets.elm.net \
    --cc=yum.rayan@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox