From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Cc: Yum Rayan <yum.rayan@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mvw@planets.elm.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in acct.c
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:09:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <424C5912.90607@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050331150548.GC19294@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Wed, 30 March 2005 23:39:40 -0800, Yum Rayan wrote:
>
>>Before patch
>>------------
>>check_free_space - 128
>>do_acct_process - 105
>>
>>After patch
>>-----------
>>check_free_space - 36
>>do_acct_process - 44
>
>
> It is always nice to see enthusiams, but in your case it might be a
> bit misguided. None of the functions you worked on appear to be real
> problems wrt. stack usage.
Yes, this is similar to what I was about to write.
It would be more useful to tackle the really large stack consumers
or ones in deep call chains.
> But if you have time to tackle some of these functions, that may make
> a real difference:
>
> http://wh.fh-wedel.de/~joern/stackcheck.2.6.11
>
> In principle, all recursive paths should consume as little stack as
> possible. Or the recursion itself could be avoided, even better. And
> some of the call chains with ~3k of stack consumption may be
> problematic on other platforms, like the x86-64. Taking care of those
> could result in smaller stacks for the respective platform.
Here is 2.6.12-rc1-bk3 raw checkstack output on x86-64:
http://developer.osdl.org/~rddunlap/doc/checkstack1.out
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-31 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-31 7:39 [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in acct.c Yum Rayan
2005-03-31 15:05 ` Jörn Engel
2005-03-31 20:09 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2005-03-31 20:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-31 20:30 ` Stack usage tasks Adrian Bunk
2005-03-31 20:43 ` Roland Dreier
2005-03-31 21:19 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-01 10:17 ` Jörn Engel
2005-04-01 11:16 ` Jörn Engel
2005-04-03 11:35 ` [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in acct.c Olaf Dietsche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=424C5912.90607@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mvw@planets.elm.net \
--cc=yum.rayan@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox