From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <dedekind@yandex.ru>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <dedekind@infradead.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] CryptoAPI & Compression
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 18:57:57 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <424D6175.8000700@yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1112366647.3899.66.camel@localhost.localdomain>
David Woodhouse wrote:
> Hm. Could we avoid using Z_SYNC_FLUSH and stick with a larger amount?
> That would give us better compression.
Yes, the compression will be better. But the implementation will be more
complicated.
We can try to use the "bound" functions to predict how many bytes to
pass to the deflate's input, but there is no guarantee they'll fit into
the output buffer. In this case we'll need to try again.
Possibly, we may do something like this:
Try good compression using the prediction technique.
If we didn't fit the output buffer, use the old but determined algorithm.
--
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-01 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-25 16:08 [RFC] CryptoAPI & Compression Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-03-26 4:44 ` Herbert Xu
2005-03-26 11:32 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-03-28 17:22 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-03-29 10:35 ` Herbert Xu
2005-03-29 11:55 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-03-31 2:19 ` Herbert Xu
2005-03-31 10:43 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-03-31 11:11 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-01 14:36 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-01 14:44 ` David Woodhouse
2005-04-01 14:57 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy [this message]
2005-04-01 15:05 ` David Woodhouse
2005-04-01 15:22 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-01 15:33 ` Jörn Engel
2005-04-03 8:47 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-01 15:23 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-01 15:41 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-01 22:13 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-03 8:22 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-03 8:27 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-03 8:29 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-03 8:44 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-03 8:59 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-03 9:30 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-03 9:45 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-03 10:00 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-03 10:06 ` David Woodhouse
2005-04-03 10:17 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-03 10:23 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-03 11:42 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-03 15:24 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-03 11:19 ` David Woodhouse
2005-04-03 11:40 ` Herbert Xu
[not found] ` <4250175D.5070704@yandex.ru>
[not found] ` <20050403213207.GA24462@gondor.apana.org.au>
2005-04-18 15:09 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-19 9:25 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-19 12:51 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-19 22:10 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-03 10:19 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-03 9:20 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-03-31 9:51 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-03 11:41 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-03 11:47 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-03 11:53 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-03 12:00 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-03 12:01 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-03 12:07 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-03 12:18 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=424D6175.8000700@yandex.ru \
--to=dedekind@yandex.ru \
--cc=dedekind@infradead.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox