public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>
To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
	Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.43-00
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 12:27:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <424D927F.2020601@cybsft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200504011231.55717.gene.heskett@verizon.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 855 bytes --]

Gene Heskett wrote:
<snip>
> It was up to 43-04 by the time I got there.
> 
> This one didn't go in cleanly Ingo.  From my build-src scripts output:
> -------------------
> Applying patch realtime-preempt-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.43-04
> [...]
> patching file lib/rwsem-spinlock.c
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 133.
> Hunk #6 FAILED at 160.
> Hunk #7 FAILED at 179.
> Hunk #8 FAILED at 194.
> Hunk #9 FAILED at 204.
> Hunk #10 FAILED at 231.
> Hunk #11 FAILED at 250.
> Hunk #12 FAILED at 265.
> Hunk #13 FAILED at 274.
> Hunk #14 FAILED at 293.
> Hunk #15 FAILED at 314.
> 11 out of 15 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file 
> lib/rwsem-spinlock.c.rej
> -----------
> I doubt it would run, so I haven't built it.  Should I?
> 

Adding the attached patch on top of the above should resolve the 
failures, at least in the patching. Still working on building it.

-- 
    kr

[-- Attachment #2: rwsem-spinlock.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3860 bytes --]

--- linux-2.6.12/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c.orig	2005-04-01 12:00:21.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.12/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c	2005-04-01 12:19:06.000000000 -0600
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ struct rwsem_waiter {
 };
 
 #if RWSEM_DEBUG
-void rwsemtrace(struct rw_semaphore *sem, const char *str)
+void rwsemtrace(struct compat_rw_semaphore *sem, const char *str)
 {
 	if (sem->debug)
 		printk("[%d] %s({%d,%d})\n",
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ void rwsemtrace(struct rw_semaphore *sem
 /*
  * initialise the semaphore
  */
-void fastcall init_rwsem(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+void fastcall compat_init_rwsem(struct compat_rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
 	sem->activity = 0;
 	spin_lock_init(&sem->wait_lock);
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ void fastcall init_rwsem(struct rw_semap
  * - woken process blocks are discarded from the list after having task zeroed
  * - writers are only woken if wakewrite is non-zero
  */
-static inline struct rw_semaphore *
-__rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int wakewrite)
+static inline struct compat_rw_semaphore *
+__rwsem_do_wake(struct compat_rw_semaphore *sem, int wakewrite)
 {
 	struct rwsem_waiter *waiter;
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -111,8 +111,8 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem
 /*
  * wake a single writer
  */
-static inline struct rw_semaphore *
-__rwsem_wake_one_writer(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+static inline struct compat_rw_semaphore *
+__rwsem_wake_one_writer(struct compat_rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
 	struct rwsem_waiter *waiter;
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ __rwsem_wake_one_writer(struct rw_semaph
 /*
  * get a read lock on the semaphore
  */
-void fastcall __sched __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+void fastcall __sched __down_read(struct compat_rw_semaphore *sem)
+
 {
 	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -179,7 +180,8 @@ void fastcall __sched __down_read(struct
 /*
  * trylock for reading -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
  */
-int fastcall __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+int fastcall __down_read_trylock(struct compat_rw_semaphore *sem)
+
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -204,7 +206,8 @@ int fastcall __down_read_trylock(struct 
  * get a write lock on the semaphore
  * - we increment the waiting count anyway to indicate an exclusive lock
  */
-void fastcall __sched __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+void fastcall __sched __down_write(struct compat_rw_semaphore *sem)
+
 {
 	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
@@ -250,7 +253,8 @@ void fastcall __sched __down_write(struc
 /*
  * trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
  */
-int fastcall __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+int fastcall __down_write_trylock(struct compat_rw_semaphore *sem)
+
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -274,7 +278,8 @@ int fastcall __down_write_trylock(struct
 /*
  * release a read lock on the semaphore
  */
-void fastcall __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+void fastcall __up_read(struct compat_rw_semaphore *sem)
+
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -293,7 +298,7 @@ void fastcall __up_read(struct rw_semaph
 /*
  * release a write lock on the semaphore
  */
-void fastcall __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+void fastcall __up_write(struct compat_rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -314,7 +319,7 @@ void fastcall __up_write(struct rw_semap
  * downgrade a write lock into a read lock
  * - just wake up any readers at the front of the queue
  */
-void fastcall __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+void fastcall __downgrade_write(struct compat_rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -331,7 +336,7 @@ void fastcall __downgrade_write(struct r
 	rwsemtrace(sem, "Leaving __downgrade_write");
 }
 
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_rwsem);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(compat_init_rwsem);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_read);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_read_trylock);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_write);

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-01 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-25 14:59 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-10 Ingo Molnar
2005-03-25 22:33 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-25 22:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-26  5:14     ` Lee Revell
2005-03-27  8:58       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-30  5:16         ` Lee Revell
2005-03-30  6:54           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-29 22:31 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-30  8:03   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31  8:55 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-25 Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 10:47   ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.43-00 Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 12:13     ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-04-01 12:52       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 14:42         ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-04-01 15:06           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 15:52             ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-04-01 16:28               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 21:26                 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-04-01 17:31     ` Gene Heskett
2005-04-01 18:27       ` K.R. Foley [this message]
2005-04-01 18:29         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 19:21           ` Gene Heskett
2005-04-01 19:19         ` Gene Heskett
2005-04-01 19:22           ` K.R. Foley
2005-04-01 23:34             ` Gene Heskett
2005-04-02  1:45               ` Lee Revell
2005-04-02  2:30                 ` Gene Heskett
2005-04-02  5:12               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-02 19:37                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-02 20:06                   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-02 20:17                     ` Lee Revell
2005-04-02 20:34                       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-02 22:38                         ` Gene Heskett
2005-04-02 20:35                     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-02 20:44                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-02 22:09                         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-03  0:06                           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-04 20:00                             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 20:40                               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-04 20:47                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 21:14                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-04 22:51                                     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-04-04 22:59                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-04 23:09                                       ` Esben Nielsen
2005-04-05  7:57                                         ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-04-05 15:18                                           ` Mike Galbraith
2005-04-04 23:06                                     ` Esben Nielsen
2005-04-05  5:34                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-05  9:25                                         ` Esben Nielsen
2005-04-02 23:45                       ` Lee Revell
2005-04-02 20:10                   ` Lee Revell
2005-04-05  7:19     ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc2-V0.7.44-00 Ingo Molnar
2005-04-05 19:06       ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-04-05 19:36         ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-08 15:22           ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-04-08 17:15             ` Lee Revell
2005-04-08 20:15               ` K.R. Foley
2005-04-08 20:17                 ` Lee Revell
2005-04-08 20:26                   ` K.R. Foley
2005-04-08 21:00                     ` Lee Revell
2005-04-08 21:36                       ` K.R. Foley
2005-04-10 17:23       ` K.R. Foley
2005-04-10 17:27         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-10 17:39           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-04-10 17:47             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-12 18:17               ` Lee Revell
2005-04-21  7:35       ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc3-V0.7.46-00 Ingo Molnar
2005-04-21  8:45         ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2005-04-21 16:16         ` Daniel Walker
2005-04-21 19:54         ` Daniel Walker
2005-04-22  6:27         ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc3-V0.7.46-01 Ingo Molnar
2005-04-22  7:34           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-22 15:48             ` Daniel Walker
2005-04-22 15:49               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-22 15:53                 ` Daniel Walker
2005-04-22 15:55                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-22 15:56                     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-26 17:49                     ` Daniel Walker
2005-05-09  7:23                       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-22 21:06             ` Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
2005-04-22 21:15               ` Daniel Walker
2005-05-04  8:24                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-22 21:17               ` Daniel Walker
2005-04-30 23:28           ` Lee Revell
2005-05-04  8:22             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-04 15:05               ` Lee Revell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=424D927F.2020601@cybsft.com \
    --to=kr@cybsft.com \
    --cc=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=rncbc@rncbc.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox