From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Cc: "'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"'Linus Torvalds'" <torvalds@osdl.org>,
"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 12:12:24 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <424DFF88.30003@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200504020100.j3210fg04870@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote on Thursday, March 31, 2005 8:52 PM
>
>>the current defaults for cache_hot_time are 10 msec for NUMA domains,
>>and 2.5 msec for SMP domains. Clearly too low for CPUs with 9MB cache.
>>Are you increasing cache_hot_time in your experiment? If that solves
>>most of the problem that would be an easy thing to fix for 2.6.12.
>
>
>
> Chen, Kenneth W wrote on Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:15 PM
>
>>Yes, we are increasing the number in our experiments. It's in the queue
>>and I should have a result soon.
>
>
> Hot of the press: bumping up cache_hot_time to 10ms on our db setup brings
> 2.6.11 performance on par with 2.6.9. Theory confirmed.
>
OK, that's good. I'll look at whether we can easily use Ingo's
tool on the SMP domain only, to avoid the large O(n^2). That might
be an acceptable short term solution for 2.6.12.
If you get a chance to also look at those block layer patches that
would be good - if they give you a nice improvement, that would
justify getting them into -mm.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-02 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-02 1:00 Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-02 2:12 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-04-02 14:53 ` [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels] Ingo Molnar
2005-04-02 21:22 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 5:53 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 7:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-03 8:15 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 11:34 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 14:12 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 15:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-03 22:30 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-05 6:53 ` [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs Andi Kleen
2005-04-05 7:20 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 15:24 ` [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels] Ingo Molnar
2005-04-03 23:08 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04 2:08 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-04 3:55 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04 5:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 5:50 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04 5:56 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-04 6:38 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04 6:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 7:37 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04 6:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 7:27 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 14:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-03 23:15 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04 1:31 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-04 6:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 6:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 0:08 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-04 4:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2005-04-04 4:36 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-04 1:11 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-04 11:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-04 17:27 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-05 1:43 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-05 1:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-05 3:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 3:33 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-06 6:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-08 2:27 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-03 9:01 ` Paul Jackson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-01 16:34 Industry db benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels Manfred Spraul
2005-03-28 19:33 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-28 19:50 ` Dave Hansen
2005-03-28 20:01 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-30 0:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-30 0:22 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-30 0:46 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-30 0:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-30 1:31 ` Nick Piggin
2005-03-30 1:38 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-30 1:56 ` Nick Piggin
2005-03-31 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 19:53 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-31 20:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-31 20:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-31 22:14 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-31 23:35 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-01 6:05 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-01 6:34 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-01 7:19 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-01 6:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 22:32 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-01 22:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-02 2:19 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-04 1:40 ` Kevin Puetz
2005-04-02 1:44 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-02 2:05 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-02 2:38 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-03 6:36 ` David Lang
2005-04-03 6:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2005-04-03 7:23 ` David Lang
2005-04-03 7:38 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-01 6:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 9:29 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-01 10:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 14:39 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-01 4:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 5:14 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-01 22:51 ` Chen, Kenneth W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=424DFF88.30003@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox