From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:45:27 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42532317.5000901@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <425322E0.9070307@yahoo.com.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4 bytes --]
2/5
[-- Attachment #2: sched-null-domains.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2380 bytes --]
The previous patch fixed the last 2 places that directly access a
runqueue's sched-domain and assume it cannot be NULL.
We can now use a NULL domain instead of a dummy domain to signify
no balancing is to happen. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c 2005-04-05 16:38:40.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c 2005-04-05 18:39:08.000000000 +1000
@@ -4887,7 +4887,7 @@ void __devinit cpu_attach_domain(struct
tmp->parent = parent->parent;
}
- if (sd_degenerate(sd))
+ if (sd && sd_degenerate(sd))
sd = sd->parent;
sched_domain_debug(sd, cpu);
@@ -5054,7 +5054,7 @@ static void __devinit arch_init_sched_do
cpus_and(cpu_default_map, cpu_default_map, cpu_online_map);
/*
- * Set up domains. Isolated domains just stay on the dummy domain.
+ * Set up domains. Isolated domains just stay on the NULL domain.
*/
for_each_cpu_mask(i, cpu_default_map) {
int group;
@@ -5167,18 +5167,11 @@ static void __devinit arch_destroy_sched
#endif /* ARCH_HAS_SCHED_DOMAIN */
-/*
- * Initial dummy domain for early boot and for hotplug cpu. Being static,
- * it is initialized to zero, so all balancing flags are cleared which is
- * what we want.
- */
-static struct sched_domain sched_domain_dummy;
-
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
/*
* Force a reinitialization of the sched domains hierarchy. The domains
* and groups cannot be updated in place without racing with the balancing
- * code, so we temporarily attach all running cpus to a "dummy" domain
+ * code, so we temporarily attach all running cpus to the NULL domain
* which will prevent rebalancing while the sched domains are recalculated.
*/
static int update_sched_domains(struct notifier_block *nfb,
@@ -5190,7 +5183,7 @@ static int update_sched_domains(struct n
case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
for_each_online_cpu(i)
- cpu_attach_domain(&sched_domain_dummy, i);
+ cpu_attach_domain(NULL, i);
arch_destroy_sched_domains();
return NOTIFY_OK;
@@ -5253,7 +5246,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
rq->best_expired_prio = MAX_PRIO;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- rq->sd = &sched_domain_dummy;
+ rq->sd = NULL;
for (j = 1; j < 3; j++)
rq->cpu_load[j] = 0;
rq->active_balance = 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-05 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-05 23:44 [patch 1/5] sched: remove degenerate domains Nick Piggin
2005-04-05 23:45 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-04-05 23:46 ` [patch 3/5] sched: multilevel sbe and sbf Nick Piggin
2005-04-05 23:47 ` [patch 4/5] sched: RCU sched domains Nick Piggin
2005-04-05 23:49 ` [patch 5/5] sched: consolidate sbe sbf Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 6:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 8:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 8:16 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-07 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-07 7:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 6:18 ` [patch 4/5] sched: RCU sched domains Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 8:01 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-07 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-07 7:58 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-11 22:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-04-12 0:03 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 5:54 ` [patch 3/5] sched: multilevel sbe and sbf Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 7:53 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 5:45 ` [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 5:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 7:51 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 5:44 ` [patch 1/5] sched: remove degenerate domains Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 7:10 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2005-04-06 7:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 8:12 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 7:49 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-07 7:00 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42532317.5000901@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox