From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] sched: remove degenerate domains
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 18:12:09 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <425399D9.8090301@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050406071341.GA7517@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Similarly I am working on adding a new core domain for dual-core
>>systems! All these domains are unnecessary and cause performance
>>isssues on non Multi-threading/Multi-core capable cpus! Agreed that
>>performance impact will be minor but still...
>
>
> ok, lets keep it then. It may in fact simplify the domain setup code: we
> could generate the 'most generic' layout for a given arch all the time,
> and then optimize it automatically. I.e. in theory we could have just a
> single domain-setup routine, which would e.g. generate the NUMA domains
> on SMP too, which would then be optimized away.
>
Yep, exactly. Even so, Andrew: please ignore this patch series
and I'll redo it for you when we all agree on everything.
Thanks.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-06 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-05 23:44 [patch 1/5] sched: remove degenerate domains Nick Piggin
2005-04-05 23:45 ` [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains Nick Piggin
2005-04-05 23:46 ` [patch 3/5] sched: multilevel sbe and sbf Nick Piggin
2005-04-05 23:47 ` [patch 4/5] sched: RCU sched domains Nick Piggin
2005-04-05 23:49 ` [patch 5/5] sched: consolidate sbe sbf Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 6:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 8:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 8:16 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-07 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-07 7:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 6:18 ` [patch 4/5] sched: RCU sched domains Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 8:01 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-07 7:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-07 7:58 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-11 22:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-04-12 0:03 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 5:54 ` [patch 3/5] sched: multilevel sbe and sbf Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 7:53 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 5:45 ` [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 5:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 7:51 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-06 5:44 ` [patch 1/5] sched: remove degenerate domains Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 7:10 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2005-04-06 7:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-06 8:12 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-04-06 7:49 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-07 7:00 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=425399D9.8090301@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox