From: Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>,
"Jesper Juhl" <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>,
"Roland Dreier" <roland@topspin.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
penberg@cs.helsinki.fi
Subject: Re: RFC: turn kmalloc+memset(,0,) into kcalloc
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:50:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42540560.2000205@grupopie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f02050406061077de4c2e@mail.gmail.com>
Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Apr 6, 2005 3:15 PM, Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com> wrote:
>
>>However "calloc" is the standard C interface for doing this, so it makes
>>some sense to use it here as well... :(
>
>
> I initally submitted kcalloc() with just one parameter but Arjan
> wanted it to be similar to standard calloc() so we could check for
> overflows. I don't see any reason not to introduce kzalloc() for the
> common case you mentioned (as suggested by Denis).
kzalloc it is, then.
By the way I did a quick measurement to see how much we could gain in
kernel size by doing this. This is with a 2.6.11-rc2, defconfig kernel:
with kmalloc+memset:
vmlinuz: 5521614
bzImage: 2005274
with kzalloc:
vmlinuz: 5513422
bzImage: 2003927
So we gain 8kB on the uncompressed image and 1347 bytes on the
compressed one. This was just a dumb test and actual results might be
better due to smarter human cleanups.
Not a spectacular gain per se, but the increase in code readability is
still worth it, IMHO.
--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
Edmund Burke (1729 - 1797)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-06 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-05 16:26 RFC: turn kmalloc+memset(,0,) into kcalloc Paulo Marques
2005-04-05 18:00 ` Jörn Engel
2005-04-06 12:09 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-04-05 18:54 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-04-05 19:20 ` Roland Dreier
2005-04-05 20:01 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-04-06 11:28 ` Jörn Engel
2005-04-06 12:15 ` Paulo Marques
2005-04-06 13:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-04-06 15:50 ` Paulo Marques [this message]
2005-04-07 23:54 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-04-09 2:11 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-04-07 21:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-08 12:38 ` Paulo Marques
2005-04-08 13:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-08 13:20 ` Jörn Engel
2005-04-08 13:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-08 16:24 ` Paulo Marques
2005-04-08 19:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-08 19:49 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-08 13:00 ` stack checking (was: Re: RFC: turn kmalloc+memset(,0,) into kcalloc) Jörn Engel
2005-04-09 14:19 ` RFC: turn kmalloc+memset(,0,) into kcalloc Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42540560.2000205@grupopie.com \
--to=pmarques@grupopie.com \
--cc=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=penberg@gmail.com \
--cc=roland@topspin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox