From: "Franco \"Sensei\"" <senseiwa@tin.it>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [INFO] Kernel strict versioning
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:08:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4256C89C.4090207@tin.it> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1838 bytes --]
Hi. I'm new in the list... please excuse me, I'm probably naive.
I'm using linux from 1997, and now I'm wondering why the kernel
versioning system has been so strict. I've been following the thread
``RFD: Kernel release numbering'', but still I have some concerns...
Earlier versions used the odd/even numbering, unstable/stable
versioning. That was quite good from a user's point of view, since it
carried significant meaning immediately.
The fact that we face a multilevel versioning number, say
2.6.11-14.4.whatever-2 is quite a pain. I'm saying not that it's a bad
idea that a product has more versions, my product follow the even/odd
and subversion numbering. I'm saying that the scripts used in the kernel
building should be quite smarter.
Actually changing a kernel results in creating a /lib/modules/version
directory, creating a heavy confusion for a user, especially when
compiling other modules outside the official kernel release: he juts
looses the modules and has to recompile them.
I was wondering about the feasibility of handling just a MAJOR.MINOR
versioning. This would be quite an increment for a user to mantain his
kernel. Modules can still be loaded and found. We would have a single
/lib/modules/2.6 being much compatible with other modules, working with
2.6.x and 2.6.y without any difficulty. Also the source tree from a
user's point of view is much cleaner, identifying the ongoing kernel
much easily.
I'm not talking about the developing process, which still uses 2.6.x,
and it's good as it identifies the current subversion, but there's no
use in collecting so many other kernels when considering them ``stable''.
I'm just wondering...
--
Sensei <mailto:senseiwa@tin.it> <pgp:8998A2DB>
<icqnum:241572242>
<yahoo!:sensei_sen>
<msn-id:sensei_sen@hotmail.com>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2005-04-08 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-08 18:08 Franco "Sensei" [this message]
2005-04-08 19:05 ` [INFO] Kernel strict versioning Adrian Bunk
2005-04-12 1:02 ` Franco "Sensei"
2005-04-12 1:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-12 2:54 ` Franco "Sensei"
2005-04-12 11:28 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-04-12 17:22 ` Franco "Sensei"
2005-04-12 18:03 ` David Lang
2005-04-14 16:52 ` Franco "Sensei"
2005-04-14 17:57 ` David Lang
2005-04-14 19:41 ` Franco "Sensei"
2005-04-14 19:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-04-14 22:33 ` Franco "Sensei"
2005-04-14 23:29 ` Al Viro
[not found] ` <425F33C2.8020301@tin.it>
2005-04-15 5:02 ` Al Viro
2005-04-14 20:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-14 22:51 ` Franco "Sensei"
2005-04-14 20:34 ` Horst von Brand
2005-04-14 22:45 ` Franco "Sensei"
2005-04-12 22:04 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2005-04-14 17:04 ` Franco "Sensei"
2005-04-12 22:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-14 17:40 ` Franco "Sensei"
2005-04-14 20:15 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-04-14 22:26 ` Franco "Sensei"
[not found] <3R6fp-7Qs-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3R71T-4S-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3Si4Q-Nh-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3SiRe-1eq-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3SjNh-1Yq-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3Ss48-qG-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3SxGA-5mR-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-04-12 21:52 ` Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@posting.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4256C89C.4090207@tin.it \
--to=senseiwa@tin.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox