From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Claudio Martins <ctpm@rnl.ist.utl.pt>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Processes stuck on D state on Dual Opteron
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:59:06 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <425B013A.5020108@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200504111505.44284.ctpm@rnl.ist.utl.pt>
Claudio Martins wrote:
> Right. I'm using two Seagate ATA133 disks (ide controler is AMD-8111) each
> with 4 partitions, so I get 4 md Raid1 devices. The first one, md0, is for
> swap. The rest are
>
> ~$ df -h
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/md1 4.6G 1.9G 2.6G 42% /
> tmpfs 1005M 0 1005M 0% /dev/shm
> /dev/md3 32G 107M 30G 1% /home
> /dev/md2 31G 149M 29G 1% /var
>
> In these tests, /home on md3 is the working area for stress.
>
> The io scheduler used is the anticipatory.
>
OK.
>
> OK, I'll try them in a few minutes and report back.
>
I'm not overly hopeful. If they fix the problem, then it's likely
that the real bug is hidden.
> I'm curious as whether increasing the vm.min_free_kbytes sysctl value would
> help or not in this case. But I guess it wouldn't since there is already some
> free memory and also the alloc failures are order 0, right?
>
Yes. And the failures you were seeing with my first patch were coming
from the mempool code anyway. We want those to fail early so they don't
eat into the min_free_kbytes memory.
You could try raising min_free_kbytes though. If that fixes it, then it
indicates there might be some problem in a memory allocation failure
path in software raid somewhere.
Thanks
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-11 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-05 2:16 Processes stuck on D state on Dual Opteron Claudio Martins
2005-04-05 2:12 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-10 2:28 ` Claudio Martins
2005-04-10 2:47 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-10 3:19 ` Claudio Martins
2005-04-11 0:38 ` Claudio Martins
2005-04-11 6:36 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-11 9:55 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-11 12:45 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-11 14:05 ` Claudio Martins
2005-04-11 22:59 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-04-12 0:22 ` Claudio Martins
2005-04-12 0:46 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-13 0:31 ` Claudio Martins
2005-04-13 2:24 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 1:19 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 7:07 ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-12 8:03 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-12 11:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 11:26 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:04 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 17:07 ` Thomas Davis
2005-04-12 18:33 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-04-13 1:45 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-11 23:46 ` Neil Brown
2005-04-12 0:30 ` Claudio Martins
2005-04-10 2:53 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-10 3:22 ` Claudio Martins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=425B013A.5020108@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ctpm@rnl.ist.utl.pt \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox