public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [patch 4/9] blk: no memory barrier
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 22:49:49 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <425BC3ED.9050202@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <425BC262.1070500@yahoo.com.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 32 bytes --]

4/9

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

[-- Attachment #2: blk-no-mb.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1174 bytes --]

This memory barrier is not needed because the waitqueue will only get
waiters on it in the following situations:

rq->count has exceeded the threshold - however all manipulations of ->count
are performed under the runqueue lock, and so we will correctly pick up any
waiter.

Memory allocation for the request fails. In this case, there is no additional
help provided by the memory barrier. We are guaranteed to eventually wake
up waiters because the request allocation mempool guarantees that if the mem
allocation for a request fails, there must be some requests in flight. They
will wake up waiters when they are retired.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>


Index: linux-2.6/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c	2005-04-12 22:05:44.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c	2005-04-12 22:26:13.000000000 +1000
@@ -1828,7 +1828,6 @@ static void __freed_request(request_queu
 		clear_queue_congested(q, rw);
 
 	if (rl->count[rw] + 1 <= q->nr_requests) {
-		smp_mb();
 		if (waitqueue_active(&rl->wait[rw]))
 			wake_up(&rl->wait[rw]);
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-04-12 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-12 12:43 [patch 0/9] various (mainly mempool fixes and block layer improvements) Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:48 ` [patch 1/9] GFP_ZERO fix Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 19:47   ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-13  1:02     ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-14 10:59     ` Manfred Spraul
2005-04-12 12:48 ` [patch 2/9] mempool gfp flag Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 19:50   ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-13  1:03     ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:49 ` [patch 3/9] no PF_MEMALLOC tinkering Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 19:57   ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-13  1:13     ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:49 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-04-12 12:50 ` [patch 5/9] blk: branch hints Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:50 ` [patch 6/9] blk: unplug later Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 19:58   ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-13  1:32     ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-13 10:20       ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-12 12:51 ` [patch 7/9] blk: efficiency improvements Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:52 ` [patch 0/9] blk: reduce locking Nick Piggin
2005-04-12 12:53 ` [patch doh/9] mempool simplify alloc Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=425BC3ED.9050202@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox