From: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:59:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <425D17B0.8070109@domdv.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1DLgWi-0003Ag-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> What's wrong with using swap over dmcrypt + initramfs? People have
> already used that to do encrypted swsusp.
Nothing. The problem is the fact that after resume there is then
unencrypted(*) data on disk that should never have been there, e.g.
dm-crypt keys, ssh keys, ...
This may lead to nasty surprises that can occur after weeks or months.
(*) unencrypted from the point of view of the running system.
--
Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use robotrap@domdv.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-13 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-10 23:19 [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 10:25 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 10:36 ` folkert
2005-04-11 11:01 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 11:38 ` folkert
2005-04-11 16:28 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 16:36 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 13:08 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 11:08 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 13:11 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 16:11 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-11 21:08 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-12 10:07 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-12 10:52 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-12 13:17 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-13 11:59 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-13 12:59 ` Andreas Steinmetz [this message]
2005-04-13 21:27 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-13 22:29 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-13 23:10 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-13 23:24 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-13 23:39 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-13 23:46 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14 0:35 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14 6:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14 8:08 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-14 9:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-14 17:11 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14 19:27 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-04-14 19:53 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14 20:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14 22:27 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14 22:11 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-04-14 22:48 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-15 9:44 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-15 9:44 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-15 17:00 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14 20:13 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14 9:05 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-15 9:44 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-15 9:47 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14 1:13 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-04-14 8:27 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14 8:31 ` encrypted swap (was Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality) Andy Isaacson
2005-04-14 8:38 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-14 8:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-04-14 1:11 ` [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality Bernd Eckenfels
2005-04-13 13:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-13 14:45 ` Andreas Steinmetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=425D17B0.8070109@domdv.de \
--to=ast@domdv.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox