Re: [INFO] Kernel strict versioning

["Franco \"Sensei\"" <senseiwa@tin.it>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1212 bytes --]

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> this is a joke right? If you really think this you have no idea what ABI
> stability means and how extremely hard it is to even sort of remotely
> approach it.

I know it's really hard, the only way of possibly having ABI is plannig 
things really carefully about every single thing, so knowing every 
single piece... It's freakin' hard.

> Trust me. It's *extremely* hard to impossible. Several security fixes
> can only be fixed this way. And it's REALLY fragile even if for other
> fixes. And I am very glad that the linux kernel people in general decide
> to not go for abi stability, the hacks that would be needed would be so
> obscene and the gains very very minimal. (it's open source, you have the
> source after all!)

The gains are simply a rough reuse of older modules! Just joking...

I was simply wondering how guys like beos/haiku (it's a microkernel... i 
know... don't even think about starting a flame) could get ABI/API... I 
mean, if it's true that they have... I don't think it's because of c++ 
instead of plain c...

-- 
Sensei <mailto:senseiwa@tin.it> <pgp:8998A2DB>
        <icqnum:241572242>
        <yahoo!:sensei_sen>
        <msn-id:sensei_sen@hotmail.com>

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]