public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Stefan Seyfried <seife@suse.de>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:44:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <425F8CE6.90200@domdv.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050414195352.GM3174@waste.org>

Matt Mackall wrote:
> Zero only the mlocked regions. This should take essentially no time at
> all. Swsusp knows which these are because they have to be mlocked
> after resume as well. If it's not mlocked, it's liable to be swapped
> out anyway.

Nitpicking:
What happens if the disk decides to relocate a close to failing sector
containing mlocked data during resume zeroing? This just means that
there will be sensitive data around on the disk that can't be  zeroed
out anymore but which might be recovered by specialized
companies/institutions.
Encrypting these data in the first place reduces this problem to a
single potentially problematic sector.
If this risk is then still too high for you then there's always the
possiblity to use a sledgehammer :-)
-- 
Andreas Steinmetz                       SPAMmers use robotrap@domdv.de

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-04-15  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-10 23:19 [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 10:25 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 10:36   ` folkert
2005-04-11 11:01     ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 11:38       ` folkert
2005-04-11 16:28       ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 16:36         ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 13:08     ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 11:08 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 13:11   ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 16:11   ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-11 20:57     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-11 21:08       ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-11 21:35         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-12 10:07           ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-12 10:52       ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-12 13:17       ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-13 11:59         ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-13 12:59           ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-13 21:27             ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-13 22:29               ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-13 23:10                 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-13 23:24                   ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-13 23:39                     ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-13 23:46                       ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14  0:35                         ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14  6:51                           ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14  8:08                             ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-14  9:04                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-04-14 17:11                                 ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14 19:27                                   ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-04-14 19:53                                     ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14 20:18                                       ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14 22:27                                         ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14 22:11                                       ` Andy Isaacson
2005-04-14 22:48                                         ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-15  9:44                                           ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-15  9:44                                       ` Andreas Steinmetz [this message]
2005-04-15 17:00                                         ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-14 20:13                                   ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14  9:05                               ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-15  9:44                             ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-15  9:47                               ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14  1:13                       ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-04-14  8:27                         ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-14  8:31                       ` encrypted swap (was Re: [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality) Andy Isaacson
2005-04-14  8:38                         ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-14  8:49                           ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-04-14  1:11                   ` [PATCH encrypted swsusp 1/3] core functionality Bernd Eckenfels
2005-04-13 13:22         ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-13 14:45           ` Andreas Steinmetz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=425F8CE6.90200@domdv.de \
    --to=ast@domdv.de \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=seife@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox