Re: [PATCH 14/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle no-slot faults at the beginning of kvm_faultin_pfn()

[Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>]

On 5/7/2024 11:58 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> 
> Handle the "no memslot" case at the beginning of kvm_faultin_pfn(), just
> after the private versus shared check, so that there's no need to
> repeatedly query whether or not a slot exists.  This also makes it more
> obvious that, except for private vs. shared attributes, the process of
> faulting in a pfn simply doesn't apply to gfns without a slot.
> 
> Opportunistically stuff @fault's metadata in kvm_handle_noslot_fault() so
> that it doesn't need to be duplicated in all paths that invoke
> kvm_handle_noslot_fault(), and to minimize the probability of not stuffing
> the right fields.
> 
> Leave the existing handle behind, but convert it to a WARN, to guard
> against __kvm_faultin_pfn() unexpectedly nullifying fault->slot.
> 
> Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
> Message-ID: <20240228024147.41573-14-seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>