Re: [PATCH v3] irqchip: gic-v3: Extend collection table

[Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>]

On 2023-07-29 07:54, wangwudi wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> A gentle ping.

Look, you keep pinging me for a patch that you haven't tested.

What do you think happens? This patch goes to the back of the queue
until I find enough time to test it on a GIC500 platform.

It is even of a lower priority given that this doesn't fix any
*real* issue, and is only for the purpose of your simulation with
non-sensical parameters (16 bytes for collection entries? let's
get real -- this only needs to be at most an affinity, for which
4 bytes are enough).

         M.

> 
> Thanks,
> Wudi
> 
> 
> 在 2023/7/7 17:04, wangwudi 写道:
>> 
>> 
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: wangwudi
>> 发送时间: 2023年6月21日 18:02
>> 收件人: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> 抄送: liaochang (A) <liaochang1@huawei.com>; wangwudi 
>> <wangwudi@hisilicon.com>; Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>; Marc 
>> Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>> 主题: [PATCH v3] irqchip: gic-v3: Extend collection table
>> 
>> Only single level table is supported to the collection table, and only 
>> one page is allocated.
>> 
>> Extend collection table to support more CPUs:
>> 1. Recalculate the page number of collection table based on the number 
>> of CPUs.
>> 2. Add 2 level tables to collection table when HCC field is zero.
>> 3. Add GITS_TYPER_CIDBITS macros.
>> 
>> It is noticed in an internal simulation research:
>> - the page_size of collection table is 4 KB
>> - the entry_size of collection table is 16 Byte
>> - with 512 CPUs
>> 
>> And I don't find a have a GIC500 platform to test this path.
>> 
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: wangwudi <wangwudi@hisilicon.com>
>> ---
>> 
>> ChangeLog:
>> v1-->v2:
>> 1. Support 2 level table.
>> 2. Rewrite the commit log.
>> v2-->v3
>> 1. Fixed the error when HCC is field is not zero.
>> 2. Modifiy the commit log.
>> 
>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c   | 67 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h |  3 ++
>>  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c 
>> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> index 0ec2b1e1df75..c37e010fd50c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ struct its_node {
>>  #define is_v4(its)		(!!((its)->typer & GITS_TYPER_VLPIS))
>>  #define is_v4_1(its)		(!!((its)->typer & GITS_TYPER_VMAPP))
>>  #define device_ids(its)		(FIELD_GET(GITS_TYPER_DEVBITS, (its)->typer) 
>> + 1)
>> +#define collection_ids(its)	(FIELD_GET(GITS_TYPER_CIDBITS, 
>> (its)->typer) + 1)
>> 
>>  #define ITS_ITT_ALIGN		SZ_256
>> 
>> @@ -2626,6 +2627,10 @@ static int its_alloc_tables(struct its_node 
>> *its)
>>  			indirect = its_parse_indirect_baser(its, baser, &order,
>>  							    ITS_MAX_VPEID_BITS);
>>  			break;
>> +		case GITS_BASER_TYPE_COLLECTION:
>> +			indirect = its_parse_indirect_baser(its, baser, &order,
>> +							    order_base_2(num_possible_cpus()));
>> +			break;
>>  		}
>> 
>>  		err = its_setup_baser(its, baser, cache, shr, order, indirect); @@ 
>> -3230,18 +3235,6 @@ static void its_cpu_init_collection(struct 
>> its_node *its)
>>  	its_send_invall(its, &its->collections[cpu]);  }
>> 
>> -static void its_cpu_init_collections(void) -{
>> -	struct its_node *its;
>> -
>> -	raw_spin_lock(&its_lock);
>> -
>> -	list_for_each_entry(its, &its_nodes, entry)
>> -		its_cpu_init_collection(its);
>> -
>> -	raw_spin_unlock(&its_lock);
>> -}
>> -
>>  static struct its_device *its_find_device(struct its_node *its, u32 
>> dev_id)  {
>>  	struct its_device *its_dev = NULL, *tmp; @@ -3316,6 +3309,56 @@ 
>> static bool its_alloc_table_entry(struct its_node *its,
>>  	return true;
>>  }
>> 
>> +static bool its_alloc_collection_table(struct its_node *its, struct
>> +its_baser *baser) {
>> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> +	int cpu_ids = 16;
>> +
>> +	if (its->typer & GITS_TYPER_CIL)
>> +		cpu_ids = collection_ids(its);
>> +
>> +	if (!(ilog2(cpu) < cpu_ids)) {
>> +		pr_warn("ITS: CPU%d out of Collection ID range for %dbits", cpu, 
>> cpu_ids);
>> +		return false;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (!its_alloc_table_entry(its, baser, cpu)) {
>> +		pr_warn("ITS: CPU%d failed to allocate collection l2 table", cpu);
>> +		return false;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool its_cpu_init_collections(void) {
>> +	struct its_node *its;
>> +	struct its_baser *baser;
>> +	void __iomem *base;
>> +
>> +	raw_spin_lock(&its_lock);
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(its, &its_nodes, entry) {
>> +		base = its->base;
>> +		if (!GITS_TYPER_HCC(gic_read_typer(base + GITS_TYPER))) {
>> +			baser = its_get_baser(its, GITS_BASER_TYPE_COLLECTION);
>> +			if (!baser) {
>> +				raw_spin_unlock(&its_lock);
>> +				return false;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			if (!its_alloc_collection_table(its, baser)) {
>> +				raw_spin_unlock(&its_lock);
>> +				return false;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		its_cpu_init_collection(its);
>> +	}
>> +	raw_spin_unlock(&its_lock);
>> +	return true;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static bool its_alloc_device_table(struct its_node *its, u32 dev_id)  
>> {
>>  	struct its_baser *baser;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h 
>> b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> index 728691365464..35e83da8961f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> @@ -400,6 +400,9 @@
>>  #define GITS_TYPER_PTA			(1UL << 19)
>>  #define GITS_TYPER_HCC_SHIFT		24
>>  #define GITS_TYPER_HCC(r)		(((r) >> GITS_TYPER_HCC_SHIFT) & 0xff)
>> +#define GITS_TYPER_CIDBITS_SHIFT	32
>> +#define GITS_TYPER_CIDBITS		GENMASK_ULL(35, 32)
>> +#define GITS_TYPER_CIL			(1ULL << 36)
>>  #define GITS_TYPER_VMOVP		(1ULL << 37)
>>  #define GITS_TYPER_VMAPP		(1ULL << 40)
>>  #define GITS_TYPER_SVPET		GENMASK_ULL(42, 41)
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>> 

-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...