public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: andrea@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mason@suse.com
Subject: Re: [patch] fix the 2nd buffer race properly
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:08:13 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4270296D.9010109@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050427105655.5edc13ce.akpm@osdl.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> 
>>When running
>> 	fsstress -v -d $DIR/tmp -n 1000 -p 1000 -l 2
>> on an ext2 filesystem with 1024 byte block size, on SMP i386 with 4096 byte
>> page size over loopback to an image file on a tmpfs filesystem, I would
>> very quickly hit
>> 	BUG_ON(!buffer_async_write(bh));
>> in fs/buffer.c:end_buffer_async_write
>>
>> It seems that more than one request would be submitted for a given bh
>> at a time.
>>
>> What would happen is the following:
>> 2 threads doing __mpage_writepages on the same page.
>> Thread 1 - lock the page first, and enter __block_write_full_page.
>> Thread 1 - (eg.) mark_buffer_async_write on the first 2 buffers.
>> Thread 1 - set page writeback, unlock page.
>> Thread 2 - lock page, wait on page writeback
>> Thread 1 - submit_bh on the first 2 buffers.
>> => both requests complete, none of the page buffers are async_write,
>>    end_page_writeback is called.
>> Thread 2 - wakes up. enters __block_write_full_page.
>> Thread 2 - mark_buffer_async_write on (eg.) the last buffer
>> Thread 1 - finds the last buffer has async_write set, submit_bh on that.
>> Thread 2 - submit_bh on the last buffer.
>> => oops.
> 
> 
> ah-hah.  Thanks.
> 
> There are two situations:
> 
> a) Thread 2 comes in and tries to write a buffer which thread1 didn't write:
> 
>    Yes, thread 1 will get confused and will try to write thread 2's buffer.
> 
> b) Thread 2 comes in and tries to write a buffer which thread 1 is
>    writing.  (Say, the buffer was redirtied by
>    munmap->__set_page_dirty_buffers, which doesn't lock the page or the
>    buffers)
> 

I don't think b) happens, because thread 1 has to have finished all
its writes before the page will end writeback and thread 2 can go
anywhere.

>    Thread 2 will fail the test_set_buffer_locked() and will redirty the page.
> 
> That's all a bit too complex.   How's about this instead?
> 

Well you really don't need to hold the page locked for that long.
block_read_full_page, nobh_prepare_write both use the same sort of
array of buffer heads logic - I think it makes sense not to touch
any buffers after submitting them all for IO...?

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.


  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-28  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-27 13:15 [patch] fix the 2nd buffer race properly Nick Piggin
2005-04-27 13:20 ` Nick Piggin
2005-04-27 17:56 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-28  0:08   ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-04-28  1:00     ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-28  1:29       ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4270296D.9010109@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox