From: Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@adaptec.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
andrew.patterson@hp.com, Eric.Moore@lsil.com, mike.miller@hp.com,
Madhuresh_Nagshain@adaptec.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] SAS domain layout for Linux sysfs
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 10:35:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42763AA1.7040508@adaptec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050429100848.GB3342@infradead.org>
On 04/29/05 06:08, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Note that the current scsi code allows to create custom per-transport
> objects below the target object. We're using that in the fibre channel
> transport class for the concept of remote ports.
Yes, I've been meaning to ask about this... since a SAS host adapter
(class) has ports (class?) which has phys (class), so there's this
hierarchy between those to-be transport classes.
Is this doable given the current infrastructure?
(I guess when it comes down to it one can represent a sub-class as
an "attribute" or even as a linked list...)
>>Once the SAS discovery algorithm has been run should we
>>show its results in sysfs??
>
>
> I think so, yes. Similar to how we have all fibre channel remote ports
> in sysfs, even if they are not scsi targets.
Ok, we can show this from each HA (/sys/class/sas_ha/...) but you do not
want the existence of /sys/bus/sas/... where things are consolidated.
I guess that's ok, and if needed, it can always be implemented later.
Luben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-02 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-13 15:22 [RFC] SAS domain layout for Linux sysfs Luben Tuikov
2005-04-24 11:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-04-25 16:06 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-04-25 16:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-04-25 17:21 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-04-25 18:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-04-26 15:18 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-04-27 12:34 ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-04-27 15:38 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-04-29 10:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-02 14:35 ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
2005-04-29 10:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-02 14:30 ` Luben Tuikov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-27 14:54 Martin Peschke3
2005-04-27 15:52 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-04-27 18:57 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-01 21:49 Moore, Eric Dean
2005-06-02 14:32 Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2005-06-02 14:57 ` Luben Tuikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42763AA1.7040508@adaptec.com \
--to=luben_tuikov@adaptec.com \
--cc=Eric.Moore@lsil.com \
--cc=Madhuresh_Nagshain@adaptec.com \
--cc=andrew.patterson@hp.com \
--cc=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.miller@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox