Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5)

Paul Jackson
2005-05-03T15:31:43Z

Dinakar wrote:
> As far as I can see only the ones marked "<----" should be under the
> dentry lock, considering the fact that it already holds the cpuset_sem
> all the while.

It looks that way to me, too.

I doubt we had any particular reason for locking entry as early
as we do in that code.

It's ok by me if you move the dentry lock lower, as you suggest.

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401