public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: george@mvista.com
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
	john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>, Liu Qi <liuqi@ict.ac.cn>,
	"'high-res-timers-discourse@lists.sourceforge.net'" 
	<high-res-timers-discourse@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Help with the high res timers
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 11:44:56 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42790A18.4000008@nortel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42790207.30709@mvista.com>

George Anzinger wrote:

> The, I think, elegant solution to the timer storm problem is to 
> not restart the timer until the user picks up the prior expiration.  
> This dynamically adjusts the timer response to the amount of machine 
> available at the time.

The disadvantage is that you then lose accuracy since each timer 
interval is increased by some random amount based on system scheduling. 
  What about some kind of ulimit-type thing to specify the minimum 
recurring interval that can be specified?  If root so specifies, you 
could have 1usec interval timers and the system would hang.  This is 
conceptually no different than busy-looping in a SCHED_FIFO task.

Chris

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-04 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <E1DSl7F-0002v2-Ck@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>
     [not found] ` <20050503024336.GA4023@ict.ac.cn>
     [not found]   ` <4277EEF7.8010609@mvista.com>
     [not found]     ` <1115158804.13738.56.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>
     [not found]       ` <427805F8.7000309@mvista.com>
     [not found]         ` <20050504001307.GF3372@us.ibm.com>
2005-05-04 17:10           ` Help with the high res timers George Anzinger
2005-05-04 17:44             ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2005-05-04 17:51               ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-05-04 18:16                 ` Chris Friesen
2005-05-04 20:36                   ` George Anzinger
2005-05-04 20:31               ` George Anzinger
2005-05-04 18:14             ` Darren Hart
2005-05-04 21:46               ` George Anzinger
     [not found]         ` <1115166592.13738.96.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>
2005-05-04 17:46           ` George Anzinger
2005-05-04 22:13             ` john stultz
2005-05-04 22:48               ` George Anzinger
2005-05-04 23:27                 ` john stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42790A18.4000008@nortel.com \
    --to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=high-res-timers-discourse@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuqi@ict.ac.cn \
    --cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox